Zeno buys a television for his home from Best Buy, Inc. on c…

Zeno buys a television for his home from Best Buy, Inc. on credit and signs a security agreement granting Best Buy a security interest in the television. A week later, Zeno is in need of cash, so he sells the television to Kramer, who puts the television in his home so he can watch the Fox Sunday night lineup (he loves that Stewie). Kramer paid a fair price for the television, and was not aware of the security interest that was held by Best Buy. Zeno then defaults on his loan to Best Buy. Best Buy then claims it has a right to recover the television from Kramer.

Kramer owns a farm in Minnesota.  He generally hates people…

Kramer owns a farm in Minnesota.  He generally hates people and dogs, so he posts several “No Trespassing” signs around the property. Zeno drives his snowmobile onto Kramer’s property without permission, and sustains serious injury when he drives through a wire fence that surrounds Kramer’s pasture.  Tortious, Kramer’s son, has permission to hunt on Kramer’s property.  A ladder to a tree stand is in disrepair, and Tortious is severely injured when the ladder breaks. Both Zeno and Tortious sue Kramer for negligence. What is the probable outcome of each lawsuit?

Husband dies with a will that reads as follows: To my wife,…

Husband dies with a will that reads as follows: To my wife, who spent money like there was no tomorrow, I leave 50 cents and a calendar. The rest of my entire estate I leave to Fifi LaMoore, who is the owner of Fifi’s Sauna and who is the only woman who ever understood my needs. Under Minnesota law, if the surviving wife is unhappy with 50 cents and a calendar.

In the year 1980, Zeno made the following inter vivos grant…

In the year 1980, Zeno made the following inter vivos grant of Minnesota real property: “To the City of Edina, so long as the property is used as a baseball field.” In 2001, Zeno died with a will that left all his property to his son, Tortious.  In 2006, the City stopped using the property as a baseball field and began construction of a fire station on the site.  Tortious lives in Arizona, and he did not visit Minnesota until 2015, when he finally learned that the City had stopped using the property as a baseball field.  Does Tortious have a right to claim a fee simple absolute interest in the property because the City violated the covenant?