Blog

Defendant Darius was convicted of homicide five years ago in a county court and sentenced to life in prison. Petra, the chief county prosecutor, who had previously secured Defendant Darius’s conviction, recently learned of new forensic tests that provided clear and convincing evidence of Defendant Darius’s innocence. Prosecutor Petra disclosed this new evidence to the court, which appointed a lawyer to represent Defendant Darius. Prosecutor Petra also disclosed the new evidence to Defendant Darius’s lawyer. Defendant Darius’s lawyer moved to set aside the conviction under a new state law that requires the court to vacate a criminal conviction when newly discovered evidence or information establishes that a convicted defendant did not commit the crime of which he was convicted. However, Prosecutor Petra opposed the motion. Although Prosecutor Petra knew that there was clear and convincing evidence of Defendant Darius’s innocence, Prosecutor Petra believed that she had a professional obligation to advocate in favor of upholding Defendant Darius’s conviction. Although the court eventually ruled in Defendant Darius’s favor and ordered the state to release him from prison, Defendant Darius remained in prison for a substantial period of time while the motion was litigated. Was Prosecutor Petra’s conduct proper?

A zoning law prohibited stores from selling alcoholic beverages before noon on Sundays. Failure to comply was a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $150. Ariana Attorney was hired by Cathy Client who owned several liquor stores. Cathy Client called Ariana Attorney to ask whether any store owners had been prosecuted for violating the law and whether the fine could be imposed for every sale on a Sunday before noon or only for every Sunday on which alcohol was sold before noon. Cathy Client also asked what he could do to minimize the risk that she would be detected. Ariana Attorney accurately told Cathy Client that the fine could only be imposed for each Sunday on which he sold alcoholic beverages before noon, not for each transaction, and that no one had been prosecuted under the law as yet. Ariana Attorney also told her that she thought it would be improper to advise her about how to avoid detection. Cathy Client thanked Ariana Attorney for the information and hung up. Several weeks later, Ariana Attorney learned that Cathy Client had begun to open her stores for business on Sundays at 9 a.m. Was Ariana Attorney’s conduct proper?

Attorney Andrew agreed to represent Client Cindy in a lawsuit. Attorney Andrew and Client Cindy executed Attorney Andrew’s preprinted retainer form that provides, in part: “Client Cindy agrees to promptly pay Attorney Andrew’s fee for services. In addition, Client Cindy and Attorney Andrew agree to release each other from any and all liability arising from the representation. Client Cindy agrees that Attorney Andrew need not return Client Cindy’s file prior to receiving Client Cindy’s executed release. Upon full payment, Attorney Andrew will return the file to Client Cindy.” Although Attorney Andrew recommended that Client Cindy consult independent counsel before signing the retainer agreement, Client Cindy chose not to do so. Attorney Andrew reasonably believes that his fee is fair and that the quality of his work will be competent. Is Attorney Andrew’s retainer agreement with Client Cindy proper?

Harry and Wilma are married but are fighting over custody of their minor children in an acrimonious marital dissolution proceeding. Harry believes that a favorable ruling of custody for him is more likely if he can show that Wilma engaged in improper or illegal behavior. Harry appeared in a crowded courtroom for a trial setting conference in the marital dissolution proceeding. His leg was heavily bandaged and he was using crutches to walk. When the judge called the case, Wilma stated that she was ready for trial but Harry asked for a continuance to allow him to receive needed physical therapy. When asked about the bandaged leg and crutches, Harry told the judge that Wilma had hit him with her car when he came to the family home to visit the children. Harry added that he was going to file a criminal complaint while in the courthouse against Wilma. The judge agreed to continue the trial setting conference for 90 days while Harry obtained physical therapy and the potential assault and battery was investigated and prosecuted, by the district attorney. Harry filed a criminal complaint with the prosecutor’s office against Wilma. She was arrested, charged and released on her own recognizance. Harry posted pictures – on Tell-It-All, a large social media platform with over 5 million users – of his bandaged leg and an old picture of Wilma dressed as a witch at a past Halloween party. The text accompanying the pictures contained allegations that “my wife” had tried to kill him. The investigator for the prosecutor’s office learned that there never had been any suggestion of violence between Harry and Wilma and that there was no evidence of damage to Wilma’s car or that Harry had sought medical treatment in connection with the alleged incident. The prosecutor obtained a dismissal of all charges against Wilma. Wilma then sued Harry for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and defamation. What is the likelihood of Wilma prevailing on each of the claims alleged in her civil action? Discuss fully.

In the first space provided, state the basis your client would have today (August 7, 2025) in the described asset.  In the second space, state the amount of gain recognizable or loss allowable for U.S. tax purposes if he sold the asset today for its fair market value.  In the third space, state the character of that gain or loss.  You may also provide advice or explanation (including any calculations) to your client.  Advice should focus primarily on U.S. tax law, but need not be limited to that and it need not involve merely the current year.  e. He has a signed Babe Ruth baseball with authentication papers. He keeps it in the china cabinet in his law office and shows it off to visitors.  It is currently valued at $75,000 and is insured for that amount.  Unbeknownst to his family and co-workers, he stole the baseball when he was fifteen.  He “shoplifted” it from a memorabilia store and was never caught, charged, accused or implicated in the theft.  At the time, the baseball was listed for sale for $12,500.  He shared this information with you, trusting your confidence, but also feeling ashamed. $ [BasisAnswer] $ [AmountOfGain] Explanation: [Explanation]

In the first space provided, state the basis your client would have today (August 7, 2025) in the described asset.  In the second space, state the amount of gain recognizable or loss allowable for U.S. tax purposes if he sold the asset today for its fair market value.  In the third space, state the character of that gain or loss.  You may also provide advice or explanation (including any calculations) to your client.  Advice should focus primarily on U.S. tax law, but need not be limited to that and it need not involve merely the current year.  c. His grandfather left him a gold watch.  Grandpa passed away a few months ago.  The watch was one Grandpa wore for several decades.  The estate executor listed it in the estate inventory at a value of $30,000, which client believes is accurate. $ [BasisAnswer] $ [AmountOfGain] Explanation: [Explanation]

The principle of state sovereignty in IR was first established by the _________ of 1648.

Constructivism in IR argues that:

You are required to write short essay responses to the question provided. Each response should be 7 to 12 complete sentences in length. Your goal is to demonstrate clear understanding, critical thinking, and the ability to apply psychological concepts accurately and thoughtfully. Proper English mechanics, spelling and grammar will be assessed as well.  If plagiarism or cheating of any kind or copy and paste is suspected you will not be rewarded any points. Translation devices are also not allowed on exams.    Compare and contrast realism and liberalism in terms of their assumptions about human nature, the role of power, and prospects for peace. Use at least two historical or contemporary examples to illustrate your points.

Identify one intergovernmental organization and describe its purpose.