A recently enacted federal statute requires the President to make each appointment of a United States ambassador to a foreign country from a list of three individuals. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is to compile the list which must be approved by the full Senate in advance of the appointment. The statute also provides that Senate confirmation of the appointment is deemed to occur automatically 30 days after the time the President names an appointee from the list, unless the full Senate determines otherwise within the 30-day period.Is this statute constitutional?
Blog
Receiving a cash reward for exceeding quarterly targets is a…
Receiving a cash reward for exceeding quarterly targets is an example of:
What can cause kidney stones?
What can cause kidney stones?
After implementing new equipment, errors increase. HR wants…
After implementing new equipment, errors increase. HR wants to determine which specific duties require retraining. HR should conduct a:
A State D law prohibits the withdrawal of groundwater from a…
A State D law prohibits the withdrawal of groundwater from any well within State D for use in another state. The express purpose of the law is to safeguard the supply of water for State D citizens. Adoption of this State D law followed enactment of a federal statute providing that “the transport of groundwater from one state to another may be restricted or prohibited in accordance with the laws of the state in which the water originates.” An association of water users in neighboring State E has filed suit to have the State D law declared unconstitutional and enjoined on the ground that it violates the negative implications of the Commerce Clause.Which of the following is the best argument supporting a motion to dismiss the lawsuit?
In a study of the Lachman Test, PPV was reported as 80%. Wha…
In a study of the Lachman Test, PPV was reported as 80%. What does PPV tell the clinician?
U.S. Senator Mintz made a speech on the floor of the U.S. Se…
U.S. Senator Mintz made a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate, in which she asserted that Fabian, a federal civil servant with minor responsibilities, was twice convicted of fraud. In making this assertion, Senator Mintz relied wholly on research done by Carter, her chief legislative assistant. In fact, it was a different man, and not Fabian, who was convicted of these crimes. This mistake was the result of Carter’s carelessness. No legislation affecting the appointment or discipline of civil servants or the program of the federal agency for which Fabian works was under consideration at the time Senator Mintz made her speech. Fabian sued Senator Mintz and Carter for defamation. Both Senator Mintz and Carter move to dismiss the complaint.As a matter of constitutional law, the court hearing this motion should:
Congress passed a statute directing the United States Forest…
Congress passed a statute directing the United States Forest Service, a federal agency, to issue regulations to control campfires on federal public lands and to establish a schedule of penalties for those who violate the new regulations. The statute provides that the Forest Service regulations should “reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, all potential hazards that arise from campfires on Forest Service lands.” The Forest Service issued the regulations and the schedule of penalties directed by Congress. The regulations include a rule that provides for the doubling of the fine for any negligent or prohibited use of fire if the user is under the influence of alcohol or drugs.Which of the following arguments best supports a finding that the rule providing for the fines is constitutional?
The process of evaluating how well employees perform their j…
The process of evaluating how well employees perform their jobs is called _________ ___________. (2 words)
The State H legislature conducted an investigation into a se…
The State H legislature conducted an investigation into a series of fatal accidents in State H involving commercial trucks with exteriors made of polished aluminum. The investigation revealed that the sun’s glare reflecting off these trucks blinded the drivers of other vehicles. In response, State H’s legislature enacted a law prohibiting commercial trucks with polished aluminum exteriors from traveling on State H’s highways. Litigation over the State H law resulted in a final decision by the United States Supreme Court that the law impermissibly burdened interstate commerce and therefore was unconstitutional. Congress later enacted a statute permitting any state to enact a law regulating the degree of light reflectiveness of the exteriors of commercial trucks using the state’s highways.Is this federal statute constitutional?