Which of the following statements is true of the congestive…
Questions
Which оf the fоllоwing stаtements is true of the congestive heаrt fаilure (CHF)?
In 1996, Cаlifоrniа vоters pаssed the Cоmpassionate Use Act that legalized the medical use of marijuana. However, that state law conflicted with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which made the possession of marijuana illegal. When federal agents from the Drug Enforcement raided a medical marijuana user's home and confiscated the drug, a group of people prescribed marijuana for medical reasons sued the federal government. They argued that the Controlled Substances Act exceeded the government's authority since the use of medical marijuana was completely within the state of California, not between states. The case reached the Supreme Court in 2004 as Gonzales v Raich. In a 6:3 ruling, the Court decided that the government did have authority to prohibit medical marijuana possession and use, even though it was legal in California. It reasoned that since marijuana sales are part of a national market, marijuana possession can be controlled by the federal government. A. Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Gonzales v Raich (2004) and United States v Lopez (1995) B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in Part A, explain why the facts of Gonzales v Raich led to a different holding than the holding in United States v Lopez. C. Describe an action that California users of medical marijuana might take to limit the impact of the ruling in Gonzales v Raich.