Whаt is Nietzsche's reference tо а hаmmer, meant tо cоmmunicate? Select all correct answers.
Dembrоke (D) оwns а smаll dаily newspaper called the Rivertоwn Gazette (RG). Pounds (P) was dating D’s nephew, Steven. Steven had asked P to marry him but P was uncertain. P always wanted to be a news reporter and had applied for a reporter job with the RG. In the interview, D said “I want my nephew, Steve, to be happy. If you agree to marry him, I will hire you as a reporter.” P said to D in reply: “It just so happens I have decided to say yes, but I have not told him yet.” D agrees to hire P. P agrees to marry Steven. D prepares a letter to P that says: “This letter is to confirm that you have agreed to spend the next 18 months working as a reporter for the RG, though if you do not complete your assignments or if your writing is not any good, you can be fired for cause. You need to write at least one article of 4000-5000 words each week about newsworthy events in Rivertown. I will pay you $1,000 for each article. I will also give you a laptop computer to facilitate your work. Regards, Dembroke.” D did provide P with a very nice laptop computer. : A week after receiving the letter, P turns in the first article on time and asks D: “Since I am working for you, will I be reimbursed for reasonable expenses I incur doing research for my articles? I was thinking of buying a drone and a police scanner, for example.” D says, “reporters are normally reimbursed for reasonable expenses. That is ok, provided they cost less than $500 each.” The next day, P buys a police radio scanner for $300 and a drone for $400 and submits the receipts to D for reimbursement. P turns in an article for week 2 on schedule, but D is not happy with the article. D writes a letter to P saying: “It is evident from your second article that you are not a good writer. You also spent too much money buying gadgets you do not need. You are fired.” D never reimbursed P, though she did pay her for the second article even though it was not printed in the RG. After the firing, D asks for the laptop to be returned and P says, "I thought it was mine - you gave it to me." If P can obtain any reimbursement through the legal system, are there legal obstacles to the recovery? If P breaks up with Steve because she was fired by D, does Steven have standing to sue D for firing P if it turns out that P is a good writer and D did not have proper cause to fire her? Can D recover the laptop she provided to P?