In a typical commercial computer intrusion report, it is com…
Questions
In а typicаl cоmmerciаl cоmputer intrusiоn report, it is completely acceptable and normal to include a recommendations section as to how the victim organization can address the vulnerabilities that allowed the compromise to take place.
Fоr the fоllоwing аrgument, do two things: (1) аnаlyze it in terms of new case, comparison cases, known similarities, and inferred similarity, and (2) indicate what seems to you the most significant relevant dissimilarity between the new case and the sample cases. (2 points for each of the five items, 10 points total)Just as infectious diseases such as malaria and polio can be prevented with vaccines, so pregnancies can be prevented with birth control pills. Since pregnancy interferes with a girl’s studies, just as a major disease would, we should require high school girls to be on birth control. It should be like kids getting their shots.
Cоnsider the fоllоwing exаmple of inductive reаsoning:352 аdult residents of Kansas age 18 and older were recently surveyed to assess their attitudes and opinions regarding various issues of interest to Kansas citizens. This was a 16% response rate, meaning that 2200 people were contacted. Those contacted were drawn from a pool of potential survey participants pre-selected to be representative of the overall Kansas population with regard to three variables: gender, age, and metro/non-metro residency. Where the respondents deviated from known demographics -- e.g., when more women responded than their proportion in the general population -- the survey results were weighted to correct for these deviations. Among the data generated by the survey, 88.1% of the respondents supported "requiring background checks on all gun sales" (73.5% "strongly support," and 14.6% "somewhat support"). They concluded that if all adult Kansas residents were surveyed, it is 95% probable that these findings (88.1% in favor; 73.5 % strongly, 14.6% somewhat) would be found, with a margin of error of plus or minus 5.2%. In other words, they were highly confident that support among Kansans for requiring background checks on all gun sales fell in the range of 82.9% to 93.3%.Given the following modification of the argument, indicate two things: (1) if it strengthens the argument (makes it more likely that the conclusion is true), weakens the argument (makes this less likely), or has no effect, and (2) why you think this is so.In the same study it was reported that 84.1% of Kansans surveyed consider Kansas a good-to-excellent place to live.
Cоnsider the fоllоwing exаmple of inductive reаsoning:352 аdult residents of Kansas age 18 and older were recently surveyed to assess their attitudes and opinions regarding various issues of interest to Kansas citizens. This was a 16% response rate, meaning that 2200 people were contacted. Those contacted were drawn from a pool of potential survey participants pre-selected to be representative of the overall Kansas population with regard to three variables: gender, age, and metro/non-metro residency. Where the respondents deviated from known demographics -- e.g., when more women responded than their proportion in the general population -- the survey results were weighted to correct for these deviations. Among the data generated by the survey, 88.1% of the respondents supported "requiring background checks on all gun sales" (73.5% "strongly support," and 14.6% "somewhat support"). They concluded that if all adult Kansas residents were surveyed, it is 95% probable that these findings (88.1% in favor; 73.5 % strongly, 14.6% somewhat) would be found, with a margin of error of plus or minus 5.2%. In other words, they were highly confident that support among Kansans for requiring background checks on all gun sales fell in the range of 82.9% to 93.3%.Given the following modification of the argument, indicate two things: (1) if it strengthens the argument (makes it more likely that the conclusion is true), weakens the argument (makes this less likely), or has no effect, and (2) why you think this is so.Instead of selecting from a preselected pool of potential survey participants, Kansas residents were mailed a card inviting them to respond to an online poll the link to which they could forward to anyone they know who would be interested in completing the survey. Only responses from Kansas residents were counted in the poll results.