Consider the following example of inductive reasoning: In Se…
Questions
Cоnsider the fоllоwing exаmple of inductive reаsoning: In September 2019, eаch student in Mrs. Newsome's first grade class (Hank James Elementary in Woolett, Massachusetts) was given three 2 oz. scoops of ice cream: one vanilla, one chocolate, and one bubble-gum tutti frutti. 2 of the 26 students preferred chocolate, 4 preferred vanilla, and 20 preferred bubble-gum tutti frutti. Researchers concluded that, with respect to ice cream flavors, American children prefer bubble gum tutti frutti to chocolate or vanilla. Consider the following modification of the argument, and indicate if it strengthens the argument (makes it more likely that the conclusion is true), weakens the argument (makes this less likely), or has no effect. Then explain why you think this is so: It was concluded that five times as many American children prefer bubble gum tutti frutti to vanilla, and twice as many prefer vanilla to chocolate.
Lаwyer оperаted his оwn lаw practice in a jurisdictiоn which follows the ABA Model Rules. He was a sole practitioner. Lawyer’s law practice was named “The Trial Specialists” and its website, business cards and letterhead all list “www.TrialSpecialists.com.” The website prominently featured photographs of several lawyers in various courtroom settings. The website declared: “We are trial specialists and members of the County Bar Trial Lawyers Association.” Lawyer’s practice included about 70% litigated matters, and he had completed about 10 jury trials in his career. Lawyer was not a certified specialist. Lawyer shares office space with several other lawyers with whom Lawyer sometimes refers matters in exchange for referral fees. After reviewing Lawyer’s website, Client retained Lawyer for a business litigation matter. Client signed an hourly fee agreement with Lawyer that complied with all rules of professional conduct. Shortly thereafter, Lawyer told Client that he was assigning Client’s matter to Attorney, “another lawyer in my office that is a specialist in business litigation.” Client verbally agreed. Attorney was a sole practitioner that shared office space with Lawyer. Attorney was not a certified specialist. Attorney requested a $10,000 advance fee, which was in fact a reasonable advance fee and that Attorney would draw fees as earned. Client paid the $10,000 advance fee by credit card. Attorney’s credit card processor deposited the $10,000 payment into Attorney’s general operating account. Attorney paid Lawyer 10% of the advance fee as a referral fee pursuant to a written, non-exclusive referral agreement between Client and Attorney. 10% was a reasonable referral fee amount. Client had a document relevant and material to Client’s lawsuit but was embarrassing to Client and harmful to his case. After Client’s lawsuit was filed, Attorney advised Client that if he no longer possessed the document, then he could not produce what he did not possess. Before the other side demanded the document in discovery, Client destroyed the document. Client reported Lawyer and Attorney to the State Bar. Analyze whether or not the Lawyer’s and Attorney’s conduct complied with the ABA Model Rules.