Category: Uncategorized

Please label your answers with the appropriate letter for each part of the question. Imagine you ask two people to give a long, boring speech in front of our class. You offer Amy $1 to do so. You offer Rory $20 to do so.  (a) Define internal justification. (1 pt) (b) Define external justification. (1 pt) (c) Which person has more external justification to give the speech? (1 pt) (d) Which person will be more likely to change their original attitudes and later say the speech was interesting and they liked giving it? (1 pt) (e) Describe the similarities and/or differences between American participants and Japanese participants in the $1 v $20 study we described in class? (3 pts) (f) If you’re thinking of running for political office,  how would you incentivize your volunteers to do the most for your campaign with the most enthusiasm? List the term for what method you would choose, and describe how it would work in the context of this example. (3 pts)

Please label your answers with the appropriate letter for each part of the question. (a) Describe how you might measure someone’s attitudes toward the social group Immigrants explicitly and implicitly (2 pts). (b) What are 2 reasons why these two measures may not align/match (2 pts)? (c) Describe the steps involved when people take an IAT (2 pts). (d) What specifically is the IAT designed to measure (1 pt)? (e) Give a specific example of the type of behaviors that IAT scores predict better than explicitly measured attitude ratings (1 pt). (f) Describe two major factors that can predict people’s IAT scores (2 pts).

Please label your answers with the appropriate letter for each part of the question. Early research in rating trustworthiness from people’s faces alone suggested that people were accurate in their ratings. (a) What confounding variable were they not controlling for in their research? (1 pt) (b) When later work corrected for this confound (Rule et al., 2013) what was their conclusion? (1 pt) (c) Based on the video we watched in class and the developmental study we covered afterward, when we make trustworthiness ratings from people’s faces alone, what are we using to make our decisions (i.e., what are these decisions based on)? (1 pt) (d) Based on the video we watched in class, how do these findings relate to real world outcomes or behaviors? (1 pt) (e) What are two categories of things that we are accurate at judging from people’s faces alone. (2 pts)

Yala comes to class at Auburn 10 minutes late one day. Yala’s Biology professor makes an external attribution and thinks:

Please label your answers with the appropriate letter for each part of the question. Ava considers herself to be a good friend, and she’s normally very supportive of the people she’s close to. However, when she’s under a lot of stress, she tends to snap at the people around her, including her close friends. When her best friend points this out, she experiences cognitive dissonance. (a) Define cognitive dissonance (2 pts) (b) What is the behavior that causes the conflict in this scenario? (1 pt) (c) What is the cognition that causes the conflict in this scenario? (1 pt) (d) What is the difference between the original dissonance theory and newer ways of thinking about dissonance and when it occurs? (2 pts) (e) List the three ways of reducing cognitive dissonance (1 pt each) and give an example for each that she may use based on her problem above. (1 pt each)

When you talk about third person, it is important that you use______________________.

Why did Marie Marols learn to lipread?

Did the professor sign correctly?  The other daughter Katie worked as a school principal for 38 years and is strong Taiwanese and little bit of Vietnamese.

ASL uses inflections for temporal aspect to:

Skillful signers can often communicate across language and cultural barriers.