Category: Uncategorized

In exchange for a share of the profits, a woman conveyed her densely forested tract of land to a logging company by warranty deed. The logging company did not record its deed.Afraid her friends and family would think she made a bad business decision, the woman kept the transaction with the logging company to herself. Prior to felling any trees, the logging company abandoned its project and returned the deed to the woman. Then, in exchange for half the tract’s market value, the woman executed and delivered a quitclaim deed to the tract to her friend. The friend intended to record the deed but forgot. Subsequently, the logging company decided to proceed with its original logging project on the land. The jurisdiction has the following recording act:A conveyance of an interest in land shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser forvalue, without notice thereof, unless the conveyance is recorded.In a suit between the logging company and the friend to quiet title, who is likely to prevail?

Think of a patient you encountered at your extern site. What clinical signs did they present with? What are 2 possible diseases that share the same clinical signs?

Two old friends reconnected over drinks at their high school class reunion. During the course of their reminiscing, one of the friends pulled an old newspaper clipping out of his wallet and showed it to his classmate. The clipping was a newspaper article from when their high school football team had won the regional championship and featured a photo- graph of both men with some of their old teammates. The classmate asked his friend if he would sell him the clipping. His friend replied, “I don’t think so, I’ve kept this in my wallet all these years as a good luck charm, but I’m sure you can get a copy of the article yourself from the newspaper’s website for free.” The classmate was not dissuaded and kept pestering his friend to sell him the clipping. After further conversation, and a couple more drinks, the friend finally orally agreed to sell the newspaper clipping to his classmate for $1,000. They agreed that the classmate would bring the $1,000 in cash to the friend’s house that weekend. The classmate wrote his name and cellphone number on a napkin and told the friend to text him his home address. The friend texted the classmate his address the next day, but the classmate never responded. The friend filed suit against the classmate for $1,000.In an action by the friend against his classmate for breach of contract, which of the following would be the classmate’s best defense?

10. The command fzero(@cos,3) finds:

A retail computer store in a high-crime neighborhood kept its parking garage on the lower level gated shut for security reasons, so anyone parking had to use a call-button to contact the store service desk for entry and egress. A city building inspector who had just exited after inspecting some renovations stopped outside the gate when he realized he had dropped his phone just inside the garage by the gate. The gate was still open so he went back in on foot and picked it up. As he was heading back out the gate suddenly started descending. The gate bumped his shoulder as he jumped out of the way. The bump ordinarily would not have caused injury, but it aggravated an existing nerve condition in his shoulder and left him with a permanent loss of mobility.The inspector sued the computer store for the permanent injury to his shoulder. Evidence at trial established that employees were required to check the security camera trained on the garage door before flipping the switch behind the customer service desk to shut the gate. All three employees working at the service desk denied flipping the switch, and footage from the security camera trained on the service desk was inconclusive. The inspector’s expert testified that there was nothing wrong with the gate that would cause it to malfunction and descend without the switch being flipped.Is the inspector likely to prevail?

11. In an if statement, MATLAB executes the block only if:

On November 1, a woman took out a $25,000 mortgage on her farm with a credit union. A week later, the woman sold the farm to her friend for $75,000. The friend knew nothing about the mortgage. On November 20, the credit union recorded its mortgage interest in the farm. The next day, the friend recorded his deed to the farm.Does the friend hold the farm subject to the credit union’s mortgage?

A pedestrian was injured by an intoxicated driver and subsequently sued a nightclub for allegedly serving too much alcohol to the driver. At trial, the nightclub’s attorney called the nightclub’s bartender to the stand. Surprisingly, the bartender testified that she served the driver approximately nine margaritas on the night in question. The nightclub’s attorney questions the bartender about her deposition testimony, in which she said that she had served the driver one margarita and then “cut him off” because he seemed too intoxicated. The bartender denies having made the statement, and the nightclub’s attorney seeks to admit the deposition statement into evidence.Is this permissible?

Which of the following is an example of work–family conflict?

On November 6, the proprietor of an independent bookstore sent a letter to a furniture wholesaler asking for the price of a certain bookshelf he knew the wholesaler sold. The wholesaler sent a written reply with a catalog listing the prices and descriptions of all of its available bookshelves. The letter stated that the terms of sale were cash within 10 days of delivery. On November 14, by return letter, the bookstore proprietor ordered the bookshelf, enclosing a check for $400, the listed price. Immediately on receipt of the order and check, the wholesaler informed the bookstore proprietor that there had been a pricing mistake in the catalog, which should have quoted the price as $450 for that bookshelf. The bookstore proprietor refused to pay the additional $50, arguing that his order of November 14 in which the $400 check was enclosed was a proper acceptance of the wholesaler’s offer.In a suit for damages, will the wholesaler prevail?