The question refers to the passage below: “The extensions of…

The question refers to the passage below: “The extensions of the franchise to the men of my country have been preceded by very great violence, by something like a revolution, by something like civil war. In 1832, you know we were on the edge of a civil war and on the edge of revolution, and it was…after the practice of arson on so large a scale that half the city of Bristol was burned down in a single night, it was because more and greater violence and arson were feared that the Reform Bill of 1832* was allowed to pass into law. In 1867,….rioting went on all over the country, and…as a result of the fear of more rioting and violence the Reform Act of 1867* was put upon the statute books… In 1884…rioting was threatened and feared, and so the agricultural labourers got the vote… Now, gentlemen, in your heart of hearts…you know perfectly well that there never was a thing worth having that was not worth fighting for. You know perfectly well that if the situation were reversed, if you had no constitutional rights and we had all of them, if you had the duty of paying and obeying and trying to look as pleasant, and we were the proud citizens who could decide our fate and yours, because we knew what was good for you better than you knew yourselves, you know perfectly well that you wouldn’t stand it for a single day, and you would be perfectly justified in rebelling against such intolerable conditions.” * The Reform Bill of 1832 give the vote to the middle class.                    ** The Reform Act of 1867 gave workers the right to vote. Emmeline Pankhurst, speech to a U.S. audience, 1913 Emmeline Pankhurst’s views in the passage would best be described as

The question refers to the passage below: “Assume, O men of…

The question refers to the passage below: “Assume, O men of the German lands, that ancient spirit of yours with which you so often confounded and terrified the Romans and turn your eyes to the frontiers of Germany; collect her torn and broken territories. Let us be ashamed, ashamed I say, to have placed upon our nation the yoke of slavery. . . . O free and powerful people, O noble and valiant race. . . . To such an extent are we corrupted by Italian sensuality and by fierce cruelty in extracting filthy profit that it would have been far more holy and reverent for us to practice that rude and rustic life of old, living within the bounds of self-control, than to have imported the paraphernalia of sensuality and greed which are never sated, and to have adopted foreign customs.” –Conrad Celtis, oration delivered at the University of Ingolstadt, 1492   The political condition of Germany described in the passage did not change until

The question refers to the passage below: “Sweet is the lore…

The question refers to the passage below: “Sweet is the lore which Nature brings;   Our meddling intellectMis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:–   We murder to dissect. Enough of Science and of Art;     Close up those barren leaves;Come forth, and bring with you a heart     That watches and receives. — William Wordsworth, “The Tables Turned” from Lyrical Ballads, 1798 The poem seems to reject

The question refers to the passage below: “Death had to take…

The question refers to the passage below: “Death had to take her little by little, bit by bit, dragging her along to the bitter end of the miserable existence she’d made for herself. They never even knew what she did die of. Some spoke of a chill. But the truth was that she died from poverty, from the filth and the weariness of her wretched life.”                                                                            –Émile Zola, L’Assommoir, 1877 Which of the following reformers would have been LEAST likely to advocate government intervention regarding the conditions described in the passage?

The question refers to the passage below: “Through all these…

The question refers to the passage below: “Through all these horrible days, I constantly met Witte1. We very often met in the early morning to part only in the evening when night fell. There were only two ways open; to find an energetic soldier and crush the rebellion by sheer force. That would mean rivers of blood, and in the end we would be where had started. The other way out would be to give to the people their civil rights, freedom of speech and press, also to have laws conformed by a State Duma – that of course would be a constitution. Witte defends this very energetically. Almost everybody I had an opportunity of consulting, is of the same opinion. Witte put it quite clearly to me that he would accept the Presidency of the Council of Ministers only on the condition that his programme was agreed to, and his actions not interfered with. We discussed it for two days and in the end, invoking God’s help I signed. This terrible decision which nevertheless I took quite consciously. I had no one to rely on except honest Trepov2. There was no other way out but to cross oneself and give what everyone was asking for.” 1Sergei Witte—advisor to the tsar 2Dmitri Trepov—Governor General of St. Petersburg Tsar Nicholas II, diary entry regarding the October Manifesto, 1905 Which of the following ideologies would have contributed most to the actions of the revolutionaries?