Category: Uncategorized

You are the NNP caring for a neonate diagnosed with stage 1 necrotizing enterocolitis. Which antimicrobial is most appropriate for this diagnosis?

A 3-day-old neonate is receiving maintenance phenobarbital for the management of neonatal seizures. The clinical team is considering a continuous infusion of midazolam (Versed) for sedation during therapeutic hypothermia. Which of the following describes the primary pharmacokinetic concern the NNP must consider regarding this drug combination, knowing that both of these medications are strong CYP3A4 inducers?

Which of the following medications to treat hypotension may be preferred in neonates over epinephrine due to maximizing coronary blood flow and minimizing beta-2 activity avoiding the adverse effects of lactic acidosis and hyperglycemia?

Which of the following antibiotic is the best choice for treatment of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) infections in the cerebral spinal fluid of infants?

The endocrine cascade shown in the image below has been discussed in class multiple times. Each of the hormones, the identity of which is hidden to protect the guilty, increases in this important cascade, which forms the basis for endocrine regulation of follicular development during proestrus and estrus. The identity of Hormone 2 in the red rectangle below is which of the following.  

In a personal injury case involving a two-car collision, Patty, the plaintiff, wishes to introduce a sworn deposition taken from Wanda, a witness who died two weeks before the case came to trial. In the deposition, Wanda stated that she saw Danielle, the defendant, run a red light at the time of the collision with Patty’s car. Both Patty’s and Danielle’s attorneys were present at the deposition. Danielle objects in the appropriate manner to the introduction of Wanda’s statement.How should the court rule on the admissibility of the deposition?

Stan, a shopper, sued Gail’s Groceries in federal court for a back injury after a fall in the store. Stan provided Gail’s Groceries with a medical report from his own doctor. However, Gail’s Groceries located a physician specializing in back injuries who agreed to examine Stan independently. Gail’s Groceries sent a discovery notice to Stan instructing him to call the physician to set up an appointment. Stan declined, asserting that he would not do so without a court order. Gail’s Groceries responded that if Stan insisted on a court order, it will also ask the court to impose sanctions on Stan for failing to cooperate in discovery.Is Gail’s Groceries’s position as to sanctions justifiable?

Chris, a customer, commenced an action in federal court against Mells Fargo, a bank, alleging that Mells Fargo violated federal banking laws. Chris then learned that another customer had successfully sued Mells Fargo on a similar claim, and obtained a copy of the court records in that action.Assuming the information in them is relevant, which of the following materials from the first action would not be admissible against Mells Fargo in the current proceeding?

Case, a consumer properly, sued Uncle Al’s Used Cars for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract in federal court. The case proceeded through trial, and following closing arguments, the judge presented the jury instructions to the jury, but failed to give one of the jury instructions requested by Case. Case’s attorney, however, did not object. Instead, he decided to wait and see how the jury would decide the case. After deliberating, the jury returned a verdict for Uncle Al’s Used Cars. Case filed a timely appeal based on the judge’s failure to give the requested jury instruction, alleging that this failure caused the jury to render its verdict in favor of Uncle Al’s Used Cars.How will the appellate court likely rule?

Elizabeth, an employee, properly sued her employer for wrongful discharge in federal court. During discovery, Elizabeth served the employer with a discovery request for information regarding all employment terminations over the previous 15 years, regardless of the position. The employer objected, and Elizabeth filed a motion to compel the requested discovery. The court denied the motion to compel, and Elizabeth wants to file an immediate appeal to review this decision.Does Elizabeth have a right to an immediate appeal?