Blog

Bud’s Concert Hall hires bands to play on one-week contracts through an agent-booker-representation firm. A typical contract would cost Bud a fixed fee to the band and a percentage of the ticket sales.   Specifically, the contract would have Bud’s profit for a week be 90% of tickets minus a $2,000 fixed fee.  So, out of the price of a ticket, Bud gets 90% and the band gets 10%. Occasionally, Bud has the opportunity to keep a band for a second week.   If Bud keeps the band for a second week, Bud’s profit will be 60% of tickets minus a $2,000 fixed fee.  So, Bud keeps a bit less of the ticket sales in the second week of an old band. Bud should switch to a new band if Bud expects the new band to sell

Carbon has 4 electrons in its outer shell, and thus:

During meiosis, sister chromatids separate during

To become a positive ion, an atom must:

The PVC pipe becomes negatively charged, therefore the cloth becomes:

A spaceship is designed to support animal life for a multiyear voyage to the outer planets of the solar system. Plants will be grown to provide oxygen and to recycle carbon dioxide. Since the spaceship will be too far from the sun for photosynthesis, an artificial light source will be needed. Suppose a plant has a unique photosynthetic pigment and the leaves of this plant appear to be reddish yellow. What wavelengths of visible light are absorbed by this pigment?

Two companies start out interdependent, but they merge. When Beta Company acts, it affects Gamma Industries. Beta has two actions, A and B. Gamma has two actions D and E. I’ll present the payoffs:                  Beta     A B Gamma D $27/ $8 $20 / $15 E $18/ $19 $11/ $18 If Beta chooses A and Gamma chooses D then Beta gets $8 and Gamma gets $27. If Beta chooses A and Gamma chooses E then Beta gets $19 and Gamma gets $18. The other cells can be interpreted similarly. The payoffs are common knowledge and Beta and Gamma are rational in the sense of being good predictors of each other’s actions.  Beta and Gamma are maximize their own payoffs. Once firms merge and are subject to a single decision maker, what actions will they take?

The PVC pipe becomes negatively charged, therefore the cloth becomes:

There are situations where activities do not get the same level of scrutiny if they seem to be small.  From the headlines: Situation 1. The indictment alleges that […], using her position […] would split contract requests from one contract into multiple, smaller contracts, in order to avoid threshold amounts that would trigger a formal, competitive bidding process.  […]  To meet the Department of Education requirement that such an informal bid have at least two competing vendor quotes for comparison, […] would obtain false and inflated quotes, by herself and from the other conspirators, designed to make the intended conspirator’s business the lower bid, and to guarantee the award of the contract.  Situation 2. […] also knew that its outside auditors only questioned additions to fixed asset accounts at any particular facility if the additions exceeded a certain dollar threshold. Thus, when artificially increasing [accounts] at a particular facility, HRC was careful not to exceed the threshold.   In Situation 1, a manager would split contracts into smaller units where the bids did not need the same level of scrutiny.  This allowed the manager to funnel the contracts to associates.  In Situation 2, a manager kept the artificial transactions below a dollar limit, because the auditors would not look at small transactions. Required: a. Which category of objective(s) is involved with Situation 1, Operations, Reporting, or Compliance? b. Which category of objective(s) is involved with Situation 2, Operations, Reporting, or Compliance? c. What can be done to prevent or detect frauds that are individually small, but add up?  I’m asking you for a bit of speculation on what organizations can do.  Incidentally, in both cases, the fraud came to light, but only after they had some effect.

17. (2 points) For the data set: Old Dies: 8000, 12500; New Dies: 7000, 8500, 5000 The above data is the number of cycles to failure of old die-cast automotive parts versus new die-cast parts. My hypothesis is that the new dies don’t last as long as the old dies (i.e.