Blog

A colony of termites was exposed to an atmosphere of 100 percent oxygen for three days. The insects were not immediately harmed by the treatment, but the protozoa that lived in the termites’ guts were eliminated. The treated termites continued to behave normally and to eat wood, but they began to starve after a short time. When the treated termites were instead fed wood contaminated with the feces of untreated termites, the treated termites regained the ability to digest wood and no longer starved. The best analysis of the results of the experiment is that

_______ is the process in which a protein is assembled at a ribosome.

In the American Southwest, annually emerging cicadas are dependent upon the cottonwood trees in the floodplain. Adult male cicadas perch in the cottonwood trees and chirp to attract females. Females lay their eggs in the branches of the cottonwoods, and, upon hatching, the cicada nymphs drop to the ground, burrow into the soil, feed on the tree roots, and later emerge as adults. Other organisms in the floodplain community prey on the cicadas, as shown in the food web. Arrows extend from the cicada to a yellow billed cuckoo, a sparrow, a lizard, a wasp, a black widow, and a kestrel. An arrow extends from a cottonwood to the cicada. An arrow extends from a lizard to a kestrel. An arrow extends from a sparrow to a kestrel. An arrow extends from a yellow billed cuckoo to a kestrel. Figure 1. Food web in floodplain community Human activity has caused a decrease in the amount of flooding and an increase in the incidence of wildfires in the floodplain. In an investigation into the recent changes in the floodplain ecosystem, researchers monitored the soil temperature, amount of cottonwood ground coverage (i.e., area of the ground that is shaded by leaves), and cicada emergence for a period from mid-June until late July. The results of the investigation are represented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The horizontal axis is labeled “Cottonwood Ground Coverage, in percent,” and the numbers O through 100, in increments of 20, are indicated. The vertical axis is labelled “Mean June Soil Temperature, in degrees Celsius,” and the numbers 18 through 28, in increments of 2, are indicated. The line of best fit is shown. The line begins at the point with coordinates 2 percent of cottonwood ground coverage comma 25 degrees Celsius and moves directly downward and to the right ending at the point with coordinates go percent cottonwood ground coverage and 19 degrees Celsius. Figure 2. Effect of cottonwood ground coverage on soil temperature The horizontal axis is labeled “Mean June Soil Temperature, in degrees Celsius,’ and the numbers 18 through 28, in increments of 2, are indicated. The vertical axis is labeled “Mean Emergence Date,’ and the dates 6 13 through 7 23, in increments of 5 days, are indicated. The line of best fit is shown. The line begins at the point with coordinates 19 degrees Celsius comma the date 7 21 and moves directly downward and to the right ending at the point with coordinates 26 point 5 degrees Celsius comma the date 6 13. Figure 3. Relationship between soil temperature and cicada emergence date To assess the impact of wildfires on soil temperature and cicada emergence, the researchers compared mean emergence dates for two natural sites where portions had been affected by wildfire. In addition, cicada emergence was monitored at an experimental site where the soil temperature was experimentally maintained. The data are shown in the table. MEAN CICADA EMERGENCE DATES AT SITES AFFECTED BY WILDFIRES OR WITH EXPERIMENTALLY CONTROLLED SOIL TEMPERATURE The table shows Mean cicada emergency dates for Natural Site 1, Natural Site 2, and Experimental Site. For Natural Site 1, the Mean Emergency Date for Unburned is July 8, and for Burned is June 18. For Natural Site 2, the Mean Emergency Date for Unburned is July 15, and for Burned is July 3. For Experimental Site, the Mean Emergency Date for 24 degree Celsius is July 14, and for 27 degree Celsius is July 5. Based upon the data, which of the following best describes the effect on the timing of cicada emergence if the cottonwood ground cover decreases from 50 percent to 25 percent?

Simpsons Diversity Index is a way to quantify the diversity of a community.  The equation can be written as: D = N(N-1) / ∑ n ( n– 1)  Where: D = Diversity index N = Total number of individuals of all species n = Number of individuals of a specific species   Community A has 3 species (A, B, C). There are 5 individuals of each species. (N=15) Community B has 6 species (A, B, C, D, E). There are 3 individuals each of species A, B, and C. There are 2 individuals each of species D, E, and F. (N=15) Community C has 5 species (A, B, C, D, E). There are 3 individuals each of species. (N=15)   What is the species diversity of Community C?

The graph is titled Wolf and Elk Population Sizes in Yellowstone National Park. The horizontal axis is labeled Year, and has values from left to right of 1993 to 2006. Each year is represented with a tick mark, and the years 1995, 2000, and 2006 are labeled appropriately. The left vertical axis is labeled Wolf Population and has values from bottom to top of 0 to 20 in increments of five. The right vertical axis is labeled Elk Population and has values from bottom to top of 0 to 120, in increments of 20. Two separate lines with points are shown on the graph. The first line is dashed and is labeled Elk. The second line is solid and is labeled Wolves. The approximate values of each respective line are as follows. Year, 1993; Elk Population, 90. Year, 1993; Wolf Population, 2. Year, 1994; Elk Population, 95. Year, 1994; Wolf Population, 2. Year, 1995; Elk Population, 80. Year, 1995; Wolf Population, 2. Year, 1996; Elk Population, 75. Year, 1996; Wolf Population, 6. Year, 1997; Elk Population, 60. Year, 1997; Wolf Population, 7. Year, 1998; Elk Population, 55. Year, 1998; Wolf Population, 8. Year, 1999; Elk Population, 57. Year, 1999; Wolf Population, 11. Year, 2000; Elk Population, 70. Year, 2000; Wolf Population, 10. Year, 2001; Elk Population, 60. Year, 2001; Wolf Population, 16. Year, 2002; Elk Population, 55. Year, 2002; Wolf Population, 17. Year, 2003; Elk Population, 40. Year, 2003; Wolf Population, 18. Year, 2004; Elk Population, 38. Year, 2004; Wolf Population, 22. Year, 2005; Elk Population, 44. Year, 2005; Wolf Population, 18. Year, 2006; Elk Population, 28. Year, 2006; Wolf Population, 12. Figure 1. Wolf and Elk Population Sizes in Yellowstone National Park The graph is titled Browsing of Aspen in Yellowstone National Park. The horizontal axis is labeled Year, and has values from left to right of 1993 to 2006. Each year is represented with a tick mark, and the years 1995, 2000, and 2006 are labeled appropriately. The vertical axis is labeled Percent Aspen Browsed and has values from bottom to top of 0 to 100 in increments of twenty. Two separate lines with points are shown on the graph. The first line is dashed and is labeled Riparian. The second line is solid and is labeled Uplands. The approximate values of each respective line are as follows. Year, 1998; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 98. Year, 1998; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 98. Year, 1999; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 98. Year, 1999; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 96. Year, 2000; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 96. Year, 2000; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 93. Year, 2001; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 95. Year, 2001; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 85. Year, 2002; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 93. Year, 2002; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 83. Year, 2003; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 91. Year, 2003; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 81. Year, 2004; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 87. Year, 2004; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 48. Year, 2005; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 73. Year, 2005; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 25. Year, 2006; Percent Aspen Browsed in Uplands, 65. Year, 2006; Percent Aspen Browsed in Riparian, 16. Figure 2. Browsing of Aspen in Yellowstone National Park The graph is titled Growth of Aspen in Yellowstone National Park. The horizontal axis is labeled Year, and has values from left to right of 1993 to 2006. Each year is represented with a tick mark, and the years 1995, 2000, and 2006 are labeled appropriately. The vertical axis is labeled Aspen Height in centimeters, and has values from bottom to top of 0 to 250 in increments of fifty. Two separate lines with points are shown on the graph. The first line is dashed and is labeled Riparian. The second line is solid and is labeled Uplands. The approximate values of each respective line are as follows. Year, 1998; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 35. Year, 1998; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 35. Year, 1999; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 32. Year, 1999; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 38. Year, 2000; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 29. Year, 2000; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 48. Year, 2001; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 35. Year, 2001; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 58. Year, 2002; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 45. Year, 2002; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 75. Year, 2003; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 50. Year, 2003; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 95. Year,2004; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 70. Year, 2004; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 135. Year, 2005; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 90. Year, 2005; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 180. Year, 2006; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Uplands, 120. Year, 2006; Aspen Height in Centimeters in Riparian, 225. Figure 3. Growth of Aspen in Yellowstone National Park Wolves, a top predator, were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park in 1995 after a 50-year absence. In a multiyear study, the numbers of wolves and elk were monitored. The data are shown in Figure 1. In two different environments scientists monitored the percent of aspen trees browsed by herbivores (Figure 2) as well as the growth of the trees (Figure 3). The upland environments consist mostly of flat forested areas. The riparian environments are areas along streams with steep, wooded banks. Which of the following models best predicts the effect on the ecosystem if a deadly communicable disease is introduced into the wolf population?

Which of the following observations best represents a mutualistic relationship?

Which of the following describes the mechanism by which a plant stem grows toward light?

Tay-Sachs disease is a rare inherited disorder caused by an autosomal recessive allele of the HEXA gene. Affected individuals exhibit severe neurological symptoms and do not survive to reproductive age. Individuals who inherit one copy of the allele (Tay-Sachs carriers) typically show no symptoms of the disorder. The frequencies of Tay-Sachs carriers in the general population of North America and in three different subpopulations are presented in the table. FREQUENCY OF TAY-SACHS CARRIERS IN DIFFERENT POPULATIONS Population Frequency of Tay-Sachs Carriers General population 0.004 Subpopulation I 0.037 Subpopulation II 0.035 Subpopulation III 0.020 A researcher claims that Tay-Sachs carriers are protected against the infectious disease tuberculosis (TB). Which of the following observations about the annual incidence of tuberculosis in subpopulation II could best be used to support the researcher’s claim?

The lionfish is a venomous fish found primarily in the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. In the 1990s, lionfish were accidentally released into the Atlantic Ocean, where they found abundant resources and favorable environmental conditions. Which of the following scenarios is most likely to result in the lionfish having a major impact on the communities into which they were introduced?

Barriers that prevent mating between species before fertilization are called ______.