Suppose a team of researchers investigated the association b…

Suppose a team of researchers investigated the association between obesity and gallstones using a prospective cohort study design. The researchers were concerned about confounding by high cholesterol diet, so they performed a few different analyses in which they attempted to minimize confounding. The results of their analyses are reported in Table 1.   Table 1. Unadjusted, stratified, and Mantel-Haenszel effect estimates from the hypothetical study on obesity and gallstones.   Unadjusted Estimates Estimates for the subsample with a low cholesterol diet Estimates for the subsample with a high cholesterol diet Mantel-Haenszel estimates Odds ratio 3.24 3.01 2.83 2.92 Risk difference 0.20 0.16 0.17 0.17   Based on the information in Table 1 report the following information: Is it appropriate to estimate a odds ratio using Mantel-Haenszel methods (yes/no)? (2 points) Explain why this is/is not appropriate (2 points). Is it appropriate to estimate a risk difference using Mantel-Haenszel methods (yes/no)? (2 points) Explain why this is/is not appropriate (2 points).

Suppose a team of researchers is interested in investigating…

Suppose a team of researchers is interested in investigating the effect of physical activity on atherosclerosis. Before conducting their study, they drew a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to determine what confounder variables they need to adjust for in the analyses. Figure 1 shows the DAG that the researchers drew.   For each of the variables in Figure 1 (stroke, LDL cholesterol, and socioeconomic status) describe 1) what type of “third variable” each variable is (1 point), 2) whether the researchers should or should not adjust for the respective variable in the analysis stage to minimize confounding (1 point), and 3) why the researchers should or should not adjust for the respective variable (1 point).  

Suppose that a team of researchers developed the following r…

Suppose that a team of researchers developed the following research question: Are American adults who undergo a mindfulness intervention at lower risk of depression after 6 months compared to American adults who were in the control group?   What are the two average potential outcomes (i.e., E[Y(x)] and E[Y(x*)]) that can be defined based on this research question? (max. 4 points per average potential outcome)  

Suppose a team of researchers performs a case-control study…

Suppose a team of researchers performs a case-control study on the effect of childhood adversity on psoriasis (a skin condition characterized by scaly patches of skin). Cases are individuals with psoriasis and controls are individuals without psoriasis. Stress was measured in interviews by asking individuals about any adverse events experienced during childhood. During the interviews, the interviewer tended to ask more clarifying questions to individuals with psoriasis compared to individuals without psoriasis.   What source of measurement error is described in the case above? Pick one (1) source (2 points) and clarify why you chose this source (max. 2 points). Note: if you write down multiple sources, only the first one will be graded.