Refer to Source 1 A 1.1.1  Explain why D. Wylie bel…

Refer to Source 1 A 1.1.1  Explain why D. Wylie believes that Shaka is NOT a pathological murderer. (1×2) (2)  1.1.2  Name THREE leadership characteristics of Shaka according to D. Wylie. (3×1) (3)  1.1.3  Comment on why you think the Europeans wanted to portray Shaka as a murderer. (2×2) (4)  1.1.4 Explain what D. Wylie means when he states, “ I am not trying to whitewash Shaka” (1×2) (2)  1.1.5  QUOTE a line from the Source that indicates Shaka’s killings were justified. (1×2) (2)     [13]   Refer to Source 1 B 1.2.1    According to Nathaniel Isaacs, why should Henry Francis Fynn portray Shaka in a negative light? (2×1) (2)  1.2.2 Explain why a source from Fynn’s diary could be considered both reliable as well as limited by a historian. (2×2) (4) 1.2.3  Compare Sources 1A and 1B. Explain how these sources highlight Shaka in history. (2×2) (4)      [10] Refer to Source 1 C 1.3.1  Which THREE chieftainships did Shaka combine to form the Zulu nation? (3×1) (3)  1.3.2  QUOTE evidence from the source that suggests that Shaka was a cruel tyrant. (1×2) (2)  1.3.3  What explanation do historians give for the manner in which Shaka reacted to his mother’s death? (1×2) (2)  1.3.4 Comment on whether Mzilakazi was justified in fleeing from the AmaZulu. (2×2) (4) 1.3.5   Explain to what extent the information in this source can be regarded as a reliable account of the Mfecane. (2×2) (4)     [15] Refer to Source 1 D 1.4.1  How is Shaka Zulu represented in the image? Use visual clues to justify your answer. (2×2) (4)  1.5 Refer to Sources 1A to 1D Use the information from relevant sources as well as your own knowledge to write a paragraph of about EIGHT lines (about 80 words) explaining how Shaka was viewed through History.  (8)      [12]   TOTAL (50)

Gebruik Bron 2A 2.1.1  Verduidelik Ordinansie 50 soos deu…

Gebruik Bron 2A 2.1.1  Verduidelik Ordinansie 50 soos deur die Kaapse Regering in 1828 aangekondig. (2×1) (2) 2.1.2 Wie was die dryfveer agter die goedkeuringsproses van Ordinansie 50? (1×2)  (2) 2.1.3 Hoekom kon dit as ‘n moeilike stuk wetgewing beskou word? (2×2) (4) 2.1.4 Hoe het Ordinasie 50 verskil van die Caledon Kode van 1809 met betrekking tot die vrye beweging van Bruinmense of die Khoi? (2×2)  (4) 2.1.5 Wat was verder deur die regering beskou as belangrike mikpunte van die Ordinansie? (1×2) (2) 2.1.6 Afgesien van die sekere mates van gelykheid, wat was die ander bekommernisse wat die wit gemeenskap uitgelig het? (3×1) (3) 2.1.7 Hoekom dink jy was dit vir die regering moeilik om Ordinansie 50 in die binneland toe te pas? (3×1) (3) 2.1.8 Hoe bruikbaar is Bron 2A om die redes te verstaan waarom die Afrikaners (Voortrekkers) die Kaap en Britse outoriteit verlaat het? (2×2)        (4) Bestudeer Bronne 2B-1 en 2B-2 2.2.1 Wat was die naam van die Goewerneur van die Kaap Kolonie wat die Hoofman aangespreek het? (1×1)  (1) 2.2.2 Hoe sou jy die verhouding tussen Harry Smith en die Xhosa Hoofmanne beskryf? (3×1) (3) 2.2.3 Gee redes vir jou antwoord in vraag 2.2.2 (2×2)   (4) 2.2.4 Verduidelik waarom dit belangrik was vir Harry Smith dat die Xhosas in Engels geleer moes word en dat gehuggies en dorpe Engelse name moes kry? (2×2) (4) 2.2.5 Lys die tipe werk wat die Goewerneur wou hê waarby Xhosa mans betrokke moes raak. (3×1) (3) 2.2.6 Verduidelik hoe Bron 2 B-2 Smith se visie van ‘n gehoorsame swarte ondersteun soos in Bron 2 B-1 uitgebeeld. (2×2) (4) Gebruik Bron 2C 2.3.1 Gee ‘n definisie van van die konsep, ingehokte werkers, soos deur die Indiërs ervaar? (1×3) (3) 2.3.2 Watter tipe werk was van Indiese vroue verwag? (2×2) (4)     [50]

Section A: Shaka Zulu  KEY QUESTION: WHAT ROLE DID SHAKA PLA…

Section A: Shaka Zulu  KEY QUESTION: WHAT ROLE DID SHAKA PLAY IN THE FORMATION OF THE ZULU KINGDOM    Section B: Colonial Expansion after 1750 KEY QUESTION: HOW DID THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN COMMUNITIES RESPOND TO BRITISH CONTROL?   Right-click on the button to view the sources for Section A and Section B

Verwys na Bron 1 A 1.1.1 Verduidelik waarom D Wylie glo d…

Verwys na Bron 1 A 1.1.1 Verduidelik waarom D Wylie glo dat Shaka  NIE ‘n patologiese moordenaar was nie. (1×2) (2) 1.1.2 Volgens Wylie, wat was DRIE leierseienskappe van Shaka? (3×1) (3) 1.1.3 Lewer kommentaar op hoekom jy dink die Europeërs Shaka as ‘n moordenaar wou uitbeeld. (2×2) (4) 1.1.4 Verduidelik wat Wylie bedoel wanneer hy se: “Ek probeer Shaka nie onskuldig laat lyk nie” (1×2) (2) 1.1.5 Haal ‘n reël aan uit die Bron wat wys dat Shaka se moorde regverdig was? (1×2)  (2) Bestudeer Bron 1B 1.2.1 Volgens Nathaniel Isaacs, waarom moet Henry Francis Fynn vir Shaka in ‘n negatiewe lig stel? (2×1) (2) 1.2.2 Verduidelik waarom ‘n bron van Fynn se dagboek deur ‘n historikus oorweeg kan word as betroubaar sowel as ‘n beperking. (2×2)  (4) 1.2.3 Vergelyk Bron 1 A en 1B. Verduidelik hoe hierdie bronne vir Shaka in die geskiedenis uitbeeld. (2×2) (4) Bestudeer Bron 1C 1.3.1 Watter DRIE hoofmanskappe het Shaka saamgevoeg om die Zulu- nasie te vorm? (3×1) (3) 1.3.2 Haal bewyse uit die bron aan wat daarop dui dat Shaka ‘n wrede tiran was. (1×2) (2) 1.3.3 Watter verduideliking gee geskiedkundiges vir die manier waarop Shaka   op sy moeder se dood gereageer het? (1×2) (2) 1.3.4 Lewer kommentaar oor of Mzilakazi geregverdig was om vir die AmaZulu te vlug. (2×2) (4) 1.3.5 Verduidelik in watter mate die inligting in hierdie bron beskou kan word as ‘n betroubare verslag oor die Mfecane. (2×2) (4) Gebruik Bron 1D 1.4.1 Hoe word Shaka in die prent verteenwoordig? Gebruik visuele leidrade om jou antwoord te ondersteun. (2×2) (4) Verwys na Bronne 1A-1D 1.5 Gebruik die inhoud van relevante bronne sowel as jou eie kennis en skryf ‘n paragraaf van omtrent 8 AGT reëls (80 woorde) waar jy verduidelik hoe Shaka reg deur die geskiedenis uitgebeeld is.  (8)     [50]