Blog

Jerry leaves home and supports himself. What has occurred?

​Which of the following statements is true regarding property law?

​A tort feasor is

Matthew tells Jake that he will buy Jake’s car for some money next month. Which of the following choices is correct?

If a criminal defendant has immunity, that often means that defendant has:

¶ L, lines 96-97. Pru financed the purchase of that machine through her cousin, Lanny Loneshark, who was charging her 17% interest. Lanny runs an enterprise between St. Louis and Chicago that uses revenue from fake cryptocurrencies to invest in local companies.Lanny and his “enterprise” could be charged with a violation of which law?

¶ K, lines 85-86. Sure enough, one day the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned, injuring Nadiya severely and damaging the building. Assume the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned because a protective shield was not part of the machine, and while the machine was in operation, a piece of the machine broke off where a protective shield should have been, causing the accident and  injuring Nadiya. KitchenButler could be liable for the product malfunction, and subsequent injury, because of:

¶ K, lines 85-87. Sure enough, one day the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned, injuring Nadiya severely and damaging the building. Nadiya was unconscious, taken by EMTs to Unity Point Hospital, and treated for her injuries. She was in a coma for four days before she regained consciousness.Liability of PruBerrys is based on:

¶ K, lines 85-86. Sure enough, one day the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned, injuring Nadiya severely and damaging the building. Assume the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned because a protective shield was not correctly installed when the machine was being made in the KitchenButler plant. This is because an assembler did not tighten a washer on tight enough, causing the protective shield to fail when a piece of the machine broke off while in operation.KitchenButler could be liable for the subsequent injury because of:

¶ B, lines 24-26. [Liverpool] drove off in one the Market’s motorized shopping carts. (That cart was found weeks later; Liverpool had sold it to a homeless person; see Exhibit 3.)By selling the shopping cart to someone, Liverpool has committed the tort of: