In the following short but complex argumentation, “therefore…

In the following short but complex argumentation, “therefore” functions as a conclusion indicator. What is the other word that functions as a conclusion indicator in the passage? The past does not exist, and neither does the future. Hence, only the present exists. However,during the present there can be no lapse of time, since the present is always instantaneous. Therefore, time does not exist. (David Hume)

Does the following contain an argument? If so, what is the c…

Does the following contain an argument? If so, what is the conclusion? If minds are identical to brains—that is, if one’s mind is nothing but a brain—androids could never have minds because they wouldn’t have brains. Clearly, a mind is nothing but a brain, so it’s impossible for androids to have minds.