A student measures the volume of a solution to be 0.03010 L. How many significant digits are in this measurement?
Blog
A 100.0 mL sample of lead has a much greater mass than a 100…
A 100.0 mL sample of lead has a much greater mass than a 100.0 mL sample of quartz. Select the accurate statement.
Which study design is best described by the following: consi…
Which study design is best described by the following: consists of collections of case reports on the treatment of several patients?
IDENTIFY A PERSON Include: Gender: Three Description: Nam…
IDENTIFY A PERSON Include: Gender: Three Description: Name:
In a non-preemptive scheduling strategy, a process that gets…
In a non-preemptive scheduling strategy, a process that gets the processor may not finish because it can voluntarily relinquish the processor.
The psuedocode of Lamport’s bakery algorithm is given below….
The psuedocode of Lamport’s bakery algorithm is given below. Fully explain why the “choosing” phase is necessary. boolean[n] choosing;int[n] ticket;startThreads();Txvoid main() { int x = threadNumber; while (!done) { choosing[x] = true; ticket[x] = maxValue(ticket) + 1; choosing[x] = false; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (i == x) continue; while (choosing[i] == true) ; while (ticket[i] != 0 && ticket[i] < ticket[x]) ; if (ticket[i] == ticket[x] && i < x) while (ticket[i] != 0 && ticket[i] == ticket[x]) ; } /* CRITICAL SECTION GOES HERE */ ticket[x] = 0; /* non-critical code */ }}
The HRRN scheduling algorithm addresses aging.
The HRRN scheduling algorithm addresses aging.
Describe how deadlock can occur if two processes are attempt…
Describe how deadlock can occur if two processes are attempting to write to a spooler file at the same time. Give a possible solution to this problem.
Below is the correct pseudocode of the ‘atomic swap’ mutual…
Below is the correct pseudocode of the ‘atomic swap’ mutual exclusion solution. Is indefinite postponement possible here? Explain why or why not. boolean occupied = false;startThreads();T1 T2void main() { void main() { boolean t1MustWait = true; boolean t2MustWait = true; while (!done) { while (!done) { do { do { swap(t1MustWait, occupied); swap(t2MustWait, occupied); } while (t1MustWait); } while (t2MustWait); // critical section // critical section t1MustWait = true; t2MustWait = true; occupied = false; occupied = false; // non-critical section // non-critical section } }} } The code is reproduced below with T2’s codebelow T1’s in case it is easier to read that way: T1void main() { boolean t1MustWait = true; while (!done) { do { swap(t1MustWait, occupied); } while (t1MustWait); // critical section t1MustWait = true; occupied = false; // non-critical section }}T2void main() { boolean t2MustWait = true; while (!done) { do { swap(t2MustWait, occupied); } while (t2MustWait); // critical section t2MustWait = true; occupied = false; // non-critical section }}
Why would a quantum that allows ALL processes to reach their…
Why would a quantum that allows ALL processes to reach their compute-to-IO time be a poor choice?