Blog

Some police officers went to an auto body shop with a search warrant to look for evidence supporting a tip that the shop owner was part of a stolen car “chop shop” ring and that he accepted stolen cars and resold the parts. While officers were talking to the owner in the shop’s office, a woman pulled her car into the shop’s garage, where a plain clothed police officer was examining some parts. The woman told the officer, “I need to have my car repaired and repainted right away because I just hit a kid on a bike and the cops will be looking for cars like mine in no time.” Shortly before the woman had entered the garage, the officer had heard over his radio about a hit and run accident involving a child on a bike. The car that the police were looking for was the color and model of the woman’s car, and the damage to the car seemed likely to be from that type of accident. The officer identified himself as a police officer and placed the woman under arrest. He performed a quick pat down of the woman’s outer clothing and looked into the large purse she was carrying. In her purse, the officer found a package that appeared to be (and later proved to be) cocaine. In addition to charges related to the hit and run, the woman was charged with possession of cocaine. At trial, the woman’s attorney moved to have the cocaine excluded from evidence. How should the court rule?

Acting on information from reliable informants that drugs were being sold by residents at a certain fraternity house, the police obtained a search warrant that entitled them to search the entire premises for illegal narcotics. The police arrived at the house when a party was in progress and were admitted to the house by the fraternity president after showing the warrant. Officers proceeded to search the house. In an upstairs bedroom, they found a young woman who was a guest of a fraternity member sleeping on the bed. No one else was in the room. The police found a footlocker under the bed and opened it, finding a variety of illegal drugs. The police then awakened the woman and seized her purse from her. They found a small quantity of marijuana in the purse. The woman was charged with a drug possession offense. At her trial, the prosecution seeks to admit the marijuana seized from her purse over the objection of her attorney. Should the court admit the marijuana?

The defendant was pulled over for speeding. After a license plate check revealed that the car was recently reported as stolen, the defendant was arrested for car theft. At the police station, the defendant received Miranda warnings and agreed to answer questions regarding a local auto “chop-shop” network. During a break for lunch, the police interrogators noticed that the defendant, who was otherwise rather shabbily dressed, was wearing an obviously expensive watch. On their return to the interrogation room, without giving any new Miranda warnings, the officers began interrogating the defendant about a recent home invasion where a quantity of valuable jewelry was taken, including a watch similar to the one the defendant was wearing. The defendant confessed to the home invasion, and was indicted on that charge, a felony. If the defendant files an appropriate motion to prevent the confession from being admitted at his trial, is the defendant likely to succeed?

Pojedete na hory na jeden týden v lednu.

A halogenated refrigerant classification with a high ODP and no longer manufactured since 1995 describes _____. 

HFCs have an ODP of _____. 

When servicing an A2L unit, technicians should verify that the refrigerant cylinder being used is certified by _____ as safe to use with mildly flammable refrigerants. 

Which of the following is not a characteristic of R-717? 

When the compressor is running on a system with a standard air-cooled condenser, the temperature difference between ambient air and condenser refrigerant is about _____. 

A refrigerant that is classified as B3 has _____.