Derek had tried to date Penny.  However, he had been repeate…

Derek had tried to date Penny.  However, he had been repeatedly rebuffed by her.  Penny had recently announced her engagement to Martin.  Angered by the engagement announcement, Derek sent the following letter to Penny: “I hope you know what you are doing.  The man you think you love wears women’s clothes when at home.  Signed, A Friend.”  The receipt of this letter caused Penny great emotional distress.  She hysterically telephoned Martin, read him the letter, and told him that she was breaking their engagement.  The content of the letter was not revealed to anyone else.  Martin was a young attorney in the state attorney’s office.  He suffered serious emotional humiliation and emotional distress as a result of the broken engagement.  If Martin asserts a claim against Derek based on defamation, and it is proven that Derek’s statement was true, such proof will be:

James recently had a traumatic experience in his work as a f…

James recently had a traumatic experience in his work as a firefighter. During a session, James describes his experience of the traumatic event while focusing on his therapist’s finger as she moves it back and forth. Which type of treatment is James receiving?

Bikeco manufactured a bicycle that it sold to Bike Shop, a r…

Bikeco manufactured a bicycle that it sold to Bike Shop, a retail bicycle dealer, which in turn sold it to Martha.  Shortly thereafter, while Martha was riding the bicycle along a street in town, she saw a traffic light facing her change from green to yellow.  Martha sped up hoping to cross the intersection before the light turned red.  Martha then realized that she could not do so and so applied the brakes of the bicycle.  However, the brakes failed.  In order to avoid traveling into the intersection, Martha turned the bicycle sharply to the right and rode the bicycle on to the sidewalk where the bicycle hit Billy, a pedestrian.  As a result, both Martha and Billy sustained injuries.  If Martha asserts a claim against Bike Shop based on strict liability in tort, will Martha prevail?