Blog

Which of the following is an example of an actus reus for which a person would not be criminally responsible?

In United States v. Mandujano, what specific actions or circumstances counted as the “substantial step” that allowed the defendant to be found liable for attempted heroin distribution, according to the Fifth Circuit?

Which of the following best describes the difference between the M’Naghten test and the ALI (American Law Institute) test for insanity?

 In Louisiana v. Booth, the court found the defendant guilty of constructive possession. Which of the following best summarizes the court’s rationale?

Police stop a car for speeding, then ask the driver and two passengers to step out of the car so they can search it. The police find methamphetamine under the rear seat. All occupants of the car deny knowing that the drug was there. Which of the following statements is accurate?

Justice Blackmun, in his dissenting opinion in US v. Bailey, wrote: “The rationale of the __________ defense is a balancing of harms. If the harm caused by an escape is less than the harm caused by remaining in a threatening situation, the prisoner’s initial departure is justified.” Which defense was he talking about?

Alex plans to rob a neighborhood pharmacy. After weeks of planning, Alex writes out a detailed checklist, gathers a ski mask, an unloaded handgun, and a bag to carry the stolen items. One evening, Alex walks to the pharmacy after closing time, puts on the mask, and tries the back door, which turns out to be locked. Just as Alex turns to leave, a police officer on patrol sees the suspicious behavior and arrests Alex. No property was taken, and no one was threatened. Analyze whether Alex is guilty of attempted robbery under the Model Penal Code. 

TRUE/FALSE. According to Judge Smith, who wrote the dissent in Acosta, Andre Acosta should not have been convicted of attempted possession of narcotics because New York’s abandonment defense applies to him.

Which of the following best describes the essential elements required for a successful self-defense claim under most U.S. jurisdictions?

Tina and Marcus are close friends who often spend time together. One day, Marcus and his coworker Neil agree to steal high-end electronics from their employer’s warehouse. Tina is not part of this conversation. Over the next week, Tina drives Marcus to the warehouse several times but never enters the building or helps carry any items. She notices Marcus often leaves the warehouse with suspiciously large boxes, but she never asks questions. At one point, she helps Marcus move several boxes into his apartment but does not open them or discuss the contents. Tina is later charged with conspiracy to commit theft.