If a judge or jury reasoned that defendants are more liable,…

If a judge or jury reasoned that defendants are more liable, or more wrongfully responsible for some harm or damage caused–because they knew of serious dangers but knowingly and intentionally ignored these dangers–then they would essentially be reasoning that these defendants were: 

Again, let:         H = Selena was born in Houston         …

Again, let:         H = Selena was born in Houston                        T = Selena was born in Texas     U = Selena was born in the United States                 M = Selena was born in Mexico Now assume that    H  ˅  M      is true.  If this is true, then WHICH of these statements can be inferred (or validly deduced)?