Blog

Congress validly enacted a law (“Act”) that prohibits the pr…

Congress validly enacted a law (“Act”) that prohibits the prescription, provision, or use of “Redux,” a controversial drug that a few years ago had been approved by the Food & Drug Administration for weight-loss, but which causes many serious side-effects in some patients. The law imposes fines on patient-users who use Redux. But physicians who recommend or prescribe the drug, or pharmacists who provide Redux, can be convicted of a felony. Doc is a medical doctor who has prescribed Redux for many of her patients and has found success with their significant losses of weight. Doc brings an action in federal court on behalf of herself and her patients challenging the Act. Doc alleges that the Act interferes with her professional judgment and prerogatives in treating patients and that patients are denied the life-extending benefits of Redux when prescribed and used in a medically controlled therapeutic plan. Pharma Reps, Associated (“PRA”) is a membership organization of pharmaceutical sales representatives that assists drug sales personnel in booking low-cost business travel accommodations. PRA also has an educational service whereby pharmaceutical sales-people can maintain fluency in the technical language of the industry. Pam persuaded the PRA to bring a federal action to challenge the Act on the grounds that it will adversely impair the incomes of herself and her fellow drug sales representatives. Rex is an experienced, registered pharmacist who recently left his employment at a national drug-store chain. He is in the process of opening up his own neighborhood prescription pharmacy but is concerned that if he dispenses Redux, he will be prosecuted and lose his livelihood. Rex brings an action in federal court to challenge the Act. How should the court rule on the federal government’s motions to dismiss 1) Doc’s; 2) PRA’s; and, 3) Rex’s respective actions for want of justiciability? Discuss fully.