Blog

Buyer sent Seller, a gadget merchant, a signed written purchase order for the purchase of 100 gadgets for $1,000. The purchase order specified that the gadgets were to be delivered in ten boxes of ten gadgets. Seller sent Buyer a signed written confirmation of Buyer’s purchase order stating, among other things, that the gadgets would be delivered to Buyer in five boxes of twenty gadgets. The confirmation also stated that acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to any additional or different terms. There was no further communication between the parties until a week later when Seller informed Buyer that Seller would not be filling Buyer’s purchase order because the price of gadgets had since quadrupled as a result of OPEC’s decision to reduce oil production.  If Buyer brings an action for breach of contract, the probable result would be that:

During a post-game celebration, Alex, a professional football player, signs a contract while severely intoxicated to sell his rare sports memorabilia collection to a fan. The next day, Alex realizes what he has done and attempts to void the contract. Can Alex void the contract?

A seller orally agrees to sell 1,000 computers to a buyer for $550,000. After shipping 500 computers, the seller decides to cancel the remaining order, and the buyer sues for breach. Will the buyer be successful in enforcing the contract for the remaining 500 computers?

At the start of the academic year Professor announced to her class that she would pay the tuition of the bar review course of the student’s choice for the student who receives the highest grade in Professor’s Contracts course. If the Professor’s announcement to her class was held to be an offer, it would be an offer for:

On December 31st, Sully and Nate contracted that Sully would install a new deck on the back of Nate’s house. Because a harsh winter was upon the area, Sully and Nate agreed in the contract that Sully would begin work on the deck on April 21st, and that he would be finished before the start of summer. Fifteen days later, Sully called Nate and told him that he had sold his business to his brother and would no longer build his new deck. If Nate sues Sully for breach, who will win?

On March 1st, a construction company and a contractor agreed in writing that the contractor would purchase a steam roller for $45,000. Three weeks before the deal was set to close, the contractor found a seller of essentially the same steam roller who was willing to sell it for $40,000. Thus, the contractor bought that steam roller and refused to pay the construction company. To offload the steam roller, the construction company, in a commercially reasonable manner and in good faith, set up a public auction for the steam roller, selling it for $35,000. On March 1st, the market price of the construction company’s steam roller was $42,000. If the construction company wins in court on a breach of contract claim against the contractor, what is the court likely to award the company?

Which of the following Restatement sections is the best example of an exception to the principle of freedom of contract?

Based on the following fact situation answer the following question: While at a party, Sarah, a software engineer, tells her neighbor, John, that she is looking to sell her unused computer equipment for $10,000. John has been contemplating quitting his job and starting his own company but has not been able to afford the necessary equipment. The equipment Sarah is offering to sell is the exact equipment John needs, and $10,000 is a price John can afford. Because of this, John quits his job to launch his own company. He contacts Sarah to purchase the equipment, but Sarah informs him that she has decided not to sell it.  Which of the following facts provides Sarah with the strongest defense against John’s breach of contract claim?

A toy store enters into a written contract with a manufacturer to purchase 500 “crimson red” wagons. On the delivery date, the manufacturer delivers 500 “fire engine red” wagons. The wagons are mechanically perfect, functionally identical to the specifications, and equal in market value to the crimson wagons. Upon inspection, the toy store rejects the entire shipment due to the color mismatch. The manufacturer sues for breach of contract, arguing that the deviation is minor and does not affect the value of the goods. Which of the following is the most likely outcome?

Based on the following fact situation answer the following question: Tina, the owner of a historic colonial style home built in 1903, entered into the following contract with Mitch, a roofer: ROOFING AGREEMENTThis agreement is made and entered into as of December 3, 2024, by and between Tina (“Homeowner”) and Mitch (“Roofer”).I.Roofing Services. Roofer agrees to totally remove the existing shingles on the roof of Homeowner’s home and replace them with slate shingles. All work will be performed in a professional manner.II.Payment. As compensation for the services, Homeowner agrees to pay Roofer $12,000 upon commencement of the work.III.Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to such matters.* * * *Prior to settling on a price and signing the above agreement, Tina told Mitch that in order to preserve the historic character of her home she wanted him to use authentic slate shingles. Mitch assured Tina that he would. They then both signed the above contract.As it turns out, authentic slate shingles were much more expensive than Mitch thought, so he used cheaper but actually more durable manufactured slate shingles. The manufactured slate shingles, however, did not have the same look as authentic slate shingles. Tina found out about the substitute and sued Mitch for breach of contract.  Assume that in the suit Tina seeks to introduce evidence of the oral conversation between her and Mitch with respect to using authentic shingles. Will the court allow this evidence to be introduced?