IRS Agent Stella May works in the SB/SE division in New Carr…

IRS Agent Stella May works in the SB/SE division in New Carrollton, MD. Stella has been working a case involving Will Smith. During lunch one day, Stella begins talking with her colleagues Zio and Lucy about the fact that Will Smith improperly took a deduction on his tax return and made over $8 million last year. Are Stella’s communications with her colleagues Zio and Lucy permissible? 

9. Christina and her husband Paul both live in Portland, ME…

9. Christina and her husband Paul both live in Portland, ME and own a cookie baking business. For the latest taxable year, Christina and Paul filed their federal income tax returns jointly and reported a tax due of $4,000. Two years later, the IRS opened an audit of Christian and Paul’s return and asserted that $2,000 remains due to the IRS. In addition to the $2,000, the IRS assessed penalties and interest in the amount of $750 and $250, respectively. What is the deficiency?

9. An excerpt from I.R.C. § 6702 of the Internal Revenue Cod…

9. An excerpt from I.R.C. § 6702 of the Internal Revenue Code provides as follows:  IRC § 6702 (b) Civil Penalty for Specified Frivolous Submissions.  (1) Imposition of Penalty. Except as provided in paragraph (3), any person who submits a specified frivolous submission shall pay a penalty of $5,000. (2) Specified Frivolous Submission. For purposes of this section – (A) Specified frivolous submission. The term “specified frivolous submission” means a specified submission if any portion of such submission— (i) is based on a position which the Secretary has identified as frivolous under subsection (c), or (ii) reflects a desire or delay to impede the administration of Federal tax laws. (B) Specified submission. The term “specified submission” means— (i) a request for a hearing under – (I) section 6320 (relating to notice and opportunity for hearing upon filing of notice of lien) or  (II) section 6330 (relating to notice and opportunity for hearing before levy) Which of the following statements from the statute above is a sub clause?