Blog

H and W married in 2010 and live in California. Prior to the…

H and W married in 2010 and live in California. Prior to the marriage, W was a successful entrepreneur with own skincare company, “GlowUp, Inc”, and had accumulated substantial wealth. After marriage, W continued to run GlowUp, Inc, and made substantial profits, which she deposited into an investment account titled solely in her business name. She did not discuss this with H. H, a screenwriter, experienced several years of sporadic employment. Without informing W, he borrowed $50,000 using a joint credit card to finance the production of his short film, which he posted on YouTube.  The film was a failure.  When the card statements arrived, W was furious and paid it off using funds from her GlowUp investment account. Around the same time, W secretly transferred $200,000 from her secret investment account to her sister, calling it a “business loan” but never demanding repayment. She did not tell H about the transfer. In 2023, W purchased a Tesla for herself, paying $80,000 from the GlowUp account. She took title in her name only and told H, “This is mine. You never paid for any of this.” In 2024, GlowUp was sued for product liability. W’s separate bank account was levied to satisfy a $250,000 judgment. H immediately filed for divorce. Analyze the rights and obligations of H, W, and creditors under California community property law with respect to the following: The GlowUp investment account and related transactions. The credit card debt incurred by H. The Tesla purchase. The product liability judgment and creditors’ rights. Any potential fiduciary duties and breaches.

Husband and Wife married in 2015.  Husband is an artist. Bef…

Husband and Wife married in 2015.  Husband is an artist. Before marrying Wife, he operated a small sole proprietorship, “H Artworks.” At the time of marriage, the business had minimal physical assets (just a rented studio and art supplies), limited income, and no employees. H handled every aspect of the business himself—painting, marketing, and selling. During the marriage, H worked 60–70 hours per week on the business. His talent and reputation grew, and the business became highly profitable. He never hired employees or made major capital improvements. H did not pay himself a salary; instead, business income was either reinvested or used for household expenses. His success was driven entirely by his labor and creative vision. During marriage, Wife worked as an attorney at a personal injury law firm. She paid most of the household bills from her earnings. In 2020, W’s grandmother passed away, leaving her an inheritance of $250,000.  W used the full amount as the down payment on a home in Beverly Hills that she and H purchased during the marriage. Title to the home was taken as “H and W, husband and wife, as joint tenants.” In 2021, H sold one of his pre-marital original paintings for $1 million. The check was deposited into their joint checking account held at Chase bank.  Shortly after, W used $100,000 from that account to buy a Tesla, which she titled in her name alone. In 2022, for her birthday, H gave W one of his early paintings as a birthday gift.  The painting was entitled, “Billable Hours”, and was a clock with wings, illustrating the fleeting billable hours against eternity. H said to W, “I gift this to you, sweetheart. Remember your time is worth more than just billable hours.  Please cherish the time you have here on earth – this painting is yours now.”  He did not sign any writing or transfer documents.  The painting hung in W’s home office where she looked at it every day.  The painting had sentimental value and had appreciated significantly – it is now worth 10 million dollars.  H Artworks is now valued at 50 million dollars.  The Chase joint checking account had $5 million remaining at their date of separation. The parties are now divorcing.  Discuss how the following assets should be characterized and divided under California community property law: The Beverly Hills home The business (H Artworks), including its appreciation Billable Hours painting Tesla Joint Checking account held at Chase.

During Pete’s annual visit to Malibu Beach the second week i…

During Pete’s annual visit to Malibu Beach the second week in June for a water show where he showcased his newest surfing techniques, he noticed a skilled surfer riding the waves. Pete approached him and introduced himself to Dale, who responded that he had read the Surfer magazine’s online profile of him last month in their article discussing the top 100 excellent surfers in the U.S.  Pete told Dale he organized an annual surfing competition in Jupiter Inlet, Florida, and that he would consider Dale as one of the contestants for this surfing competition.  In order to qualify as a contestant in the surfing competition, Pete explained that the surfer had to have participated in at least one surfing competition.  Dale replied that he had already competed in a few competitions and had earned several awards as a surfer, and that he had been recently invited to submit his name for the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles.  Pete said he’d watch him surf over the next few days and touch base later.  Dale got up early each of the next four days and practiced his surfing, not sure where Pete was watching from the beach. He barely ate or slept during those next four days working hard to perfect his surfing techniques.  He was excited to be invited to a surfing contest since he had just started surfing and seemed to have a natural gift for it, even though he had not won any awards or even been invited to participate in the upcoming Summer Olympics. On the afternoon of the fourth day at Malibu Beach, Pete approached Dale and invited him to lunch.  Pete ordered champagne to celebrate a successful end to a couple days of surfing.  Pete waved off the waiter who pointed out that Dale driver’s license showed he was only 17, not the legal drinking age of 18.  “This man deserves a glass of champagne; you should have seen him out on the waves!”   Then Pete handed blurry-eyed Dale a pen and flipped to the last page of the agreement and told Dale that signing the agreement was a prerequisite to participating in the surfing competition.  The agreement contained an arbitration clause (in a small 8-point font)  stating that only Pete could recover attorney fees if the parties had to go to arbitration.  The contract also provided that the $1,300 participation fee was due a week before the surfing competition, and Jupiter Inlet would be the only place where the surfing competition would take place.  The competition would also not be rescheduled from the firm date of August 16th.  Dale still felt uncertain about signing a contract to participate in the surfing contest, and he felt nauseous from the lack of food and sleep over the last four days.  He also hesitated because of the $1,300 participation fee because money was an issue for Dale since he only worked part-time over the summer as a lifeguard.  When Dale told him he felt sick, Pete insisted it was a great networking opportunity and there would even be a cash prize of $5,000 for the winner.  He also told him that if he paid the $500 deposit, he would save $200 because the rates for the deposit were set to go up in two weeks.  “You have to understand, there are surfers around the country that come to this event, and we don’t have the space to accept everyone, so if you are serious about this, you better sign this contract and give me the $500 deposit today.  This is a chance of a lifetime!”  Dale complied and signed the contract and paid Pete $500 before he excused himself to go to the bathroom and threw up. Pete sent Dale an email a week before the competition and told him he’d hear from his attorney since he never paid the $1,300 and his check for $500 bounced.  On August 16th, Jupiter Inlet Beach was closed due to a tropical storm causing 70 mph winds and damage to buildings on the beach. Discuss the possible claims Pete has against Dale.  Discuss Dale’s defenses. 

Daphne had worked hard all of her life to build her successf…

Daphne had worked hard all of her life to build her successful hair salon that sold only the highest quality hair products including such healthy ingredients as rosemary oil, coconut oil, and biotin.  Daphne trained her niece Amy in the specifics of purchasing quality hair products for her hair salon.  Amy was valuable as she was a natural salesperson and bought affordable products from suppliers for the salon that Daphne’s customers appreciated and kept purchasing.  During the last summer that Amy worked in the salon, Daphne noticed a change in Amy.  She started questioning Daphne’s authority on numerous occasions and started arriving late and leaving early from work.  One day, Daphne overheard Amy in the back room speaking in a lowered voice to someone.  She peered around the corner and saw Amy producing some cash to the man who unloaded some boxes off of a truck before he left.  When she questioned Amy and asked her who the man was, Amy refused to answer and said “What do you care?  Isn’t it just about making your customers happy with the products, anyway?”  Since Amy was leaving the next week, Daphne decided to forget about the conversation. Two weeks later, Amy’s replacement (Kim) approached Daphne and told her that she had received an email from Amy who informed her she needed to continue purchasing the hair products from the PMX Beauty supplier for Daphne.  However, Kim had done her due diligence and researched the supplier and learned that the prices for their inventory were lower because it was an underground criminal supplier who stole the products from delivery trucks from the manufacturer.  Daphne was shocked when she heard this, but she immediately thought about all of her regular customers who would be devastated and go to a different hair salon if the truth came out.  Daphne told Kim to do what Amy told her, to contact the PMX Beauty supplier, and not to tell anyone about the situation. Four months later, Priscilla (a representative from the supplier) walked into the salon in order to meet with Daphne, who told her to wait in the back room until all of the customers left the salon.  When she sat down, Priscilla tapped her long carefully polished pink fingernails on Daphne’s desk and impatiently told her that in order to continue doing business with PMX Beauty, Daphne had to sign the letter she handed her that required her to pay last month’s missed payment.  The letter also required her to produce copies of the hair salon’s last two months’ bank statements because of last month’s missed payment.  Daphne agreed and promised to make future payments on time.  While scanning the letter, she exclaimed out loud “This is fantastic!  We can now purchase a case of 2-ounce PMX Beauty shampoo containing aloe for only $150!”  Priscilla leaned towards Daphne and whispered that another requirement was that Daphne would have to stock and vigorously promote only PMX Beauty products.  Failure to do that would result in possible disclosure to the public of her involvement with a supplier with underground criminal connections that would ruin her business.  Daphne signed the agreement, made the overdue payment, and the new agreement was to go into effect 14 days thereafter. Three days after the meeting, Daphne received a copy of the signed agreement.  When she noticed that the case of shampoo was actually $1,500 and the PMX Beauty shampoo did not contain aloe, she immediately sent an email to Priscilla and said her salon would no longer carry PMX Beauty products. Discuss all claims that PMX Beauty and Priscilla have against Daphne.  Discuss Daphne’s defenses.

In 2012, longtime California residents Wendy and Howard were…

In 2012, longtime California residents Wendy and Howard were married. At the time of the marriage, Howard was a practicing attorney earning $250,000 annually, while Wendy was attending college. During the marriage, Howard continued to work full-time, and Wendy attended medical school from 2012 through 2016. During this period, Howard paid for Wendy’s medical school tuition and all household living expenses, including Wendy’s personal expenses, using his earnings. Wendy graduated in 2017 and began a residency program, which lasted through 2020. During her residency, she earned approximately $50,000 annually. Prior to the marriage, Wendy inherited a condominium and $100,000 in cash from her aunt. The cash was deposited into an account at First Savings Bank held solely in Wendy’s name. The condominium was titled in Wendy’s name alone and was subject to a mortgage in her name. After marriage, Howard used his earnings to make the mortgage payments on the condominium. Once Wendy began earning an income, she took over responsibility for household expenses, while Howard continued paying the mortgage. Because Wendy’s income was insufficient to cover all household expenses, funds from her First Savings Bank account were also used to cover the shortfall. In 2021, without informing Wendy, Howard withdrew $20,000 from their jointly held community checking account and gave the funds to his brother to help pay for urgent medical bills. Wendy only learned about the withdrawal during the divorce proceeding, well after the funds had been disbursed. Also in 2021, Wendy obtained a position as a family physician, earning a substantially higher salary. Wendy and Howard separated in 2023 and Howard filed for dissolution of marriage in 2024. What are Wendy’s and Howard’s respective rights and liabilities regarding: Wendy’s Tuition and Expenses? The condo? The $20,000 gift to Howard’s brother? Answer according to California law.