Essay #2 (see directions above) Passage A: “Why, when that r…

Essay #2 (see directions above) Passage A: “Why, when that rhapsodic hound was here, did you say nothing to save these people? Yet hers was a riddle not just anyone might solve. It required skill…you didn’t seem to have… And then I came along, [A], I stopped her, using my brains.” Passage B: “And yet, on reflection, I did well to honor you. For if I’d been a mother, or if it were my spouse who lay there rotting, I would not for that reason have acted in defiance of the citizens. …My husband dead, another could take his place, and a child by another man, if I lost the one I had, but with both parents buried in Hades, no brother could ever come to light.” Passage C: “Uphill flow streams from sacred springs, the balance in all things is reversed; men’s designs are deceitful, their oaths—sealed by the gods—dissolve… Honor comes to women: the harsh sound of ill repute will bind them no more.” Passage D: [He] pulled the knife dripping with blood from [her] body. Holding it before him he cried, ‘By this blood, so pure before defilement… I will drive out [the king] together with his criminal wife and all his progeny with sword, fire, and whatever force I can muster, nor will I allow them or anyone else to be king at Rome.’

Describe Nagel’s view of death in your own words, making spe…

Describe Nagel’s view of death in your own words, making specific reference to his discussion of deprivation and the comparison between death and pre-birth nonexistence. Then reflect on how this view influences your own understanding of the meaning of life. Does thinking about death as a loss of future goods make life feel more meaningful, less meaningful, or more uncertain? Do you agree with Nagel that the problem of death raises deeper questions about whether life has an overall purpose?