Author: Anonymous

The Outcome Based Wraparound principle states that the wraparound process and plan identify, build on, and enhance capabilities, knowledge, skills, and assets of the child and family, their community, and other team members.

According to Tobon et al. (2015), Sharing information within an agency, and between sectors, emerged as a key theme, which was conceptualized under informational continuity.  

Culturally incompetent practices can increase family risk and negatively affect child welfare outcomes.

The Liberty question emphasizes respect for personal autonomy and informed consent.

When determining the level of sufficiency in child welfare, the intention is to arrive at a decision regarding the most appropriate and least restrictive means forcontrolling and managing identified Impending Danger Threats and therefore assuring child safety. 

Fragmentation of services was identified by families as a risk factor negatively impacting children’s behavioral health outcomes.

Which Wraparound principle focuses on building plans around what strengths already exist within the child, family, and community?

What does SIPP stand for? 

How did providers describe the role of continuity of care in treatment outcomes?

Systems of Care engaged in increasing cultural and linguistic competence should provide reinforcements and system supports that increase self-awareness, knowledge, and capacity for culturally and linguistically competent practice throughout the System of Care.