PAMPs would be found on the surface of which of the following?
Author: Anonymous
Extra credit case study In August 2014, a 68-year-old man su…
Extra credit case study In August 2014, a 68-year-old man sustained a deep bite to his left fourth and fifth fingers from his pet African gray parrot. The gentleman had a past medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, for which he took regular inhaled steroids. He was also severely affected by osteoarthritis, for which he took long-acting morphine as analgesia. A day following the parrot bite, he saw his family practitioner for a consultation. The practitioner noted a laceration over the fourth proximal interphalangeal phalanx (PIP) with reddening of the surrounding tissues, and a course of oral antibiotics that have a broad spectrum against most Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria was prescribed for a presumed diagnosis of bacterial cellulitis (skin infection)… In October 2015, the patient again visited his general practitioner with worsening fourth finger swelling and erythema and a new fleshy nodule on the dorsal aspect of the left wrist. In November 2015, a rheumatologist injected steroids into the fourth PIP joint. In December 2015, the fourth PIP wound reopened and his entire left hand became red and swollen. The orthopedic team performed an initial washout with debridement, and amputation was considered. In February 2016, a second washout was performed from which deep tissue swabs showed non-nucleated acid-fast bacilli on a smear. A comprehensive medical history taken in February 2016 revealed that, in addition to the African gray parrot, the patient kept tropical fish and had cleaned the fish tank thoroughly following the parrot bite. The organism identified as the cause of this man’s infection is a naturally occurring aquatic organism found in freshwater and salt water. In humans, it predominantly causes soft tissue infections following exposure to contaminated water. The most common presentation is “fish tank granuloma”, i.e., hand infection following exposure to fish tank water. The majority of cases have a preceding injury to the hand (e.g., bites, abrasions, or puncture wounds) prior to the exposure that allowed entry of the organism through the dermis and into the soft tissue. Based on what you know about the cell structure of the etiological agent, is it likely that the fish tank water can be easily treated with disinfectants to kill the agent but not the fish?
Extra credit case study In August 2014, a 68-year-old man su…
Extra credit case study In August 2014, a 68-year-old man sustained a deep bite to his left fourth and fifth fingers from his pet African gray parrot. The gentleman had a past medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, for which he took regular inhaled steroids. He was also severely affected by osteoarthritis, for which he took long-acting morphine as analgesia. A day following the parrot bite, he saw his family practitioner for a consultation. The practitioner noted a laceration over the fourth proximal interphalangeal phalanx (PIP) with reddening of the surrounding tissues, and a course of oral antibiotics that have a broad spectrum against most Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria was prescribed for a presumed diagnosis of bacterial cellulitis (skin infection)… In October 2015, the patient again visited his general practitioner with worsening fourth finger swelling and erythema and a new fleshy nodule on the dorsal aspect of the left wrist. In November 2015, a rheumatologist injected steroids into the fourth PIP joint. In December 2015, the fourth PIP wound reopened and his entire left hand became red and swollen. The orthopedic team performed an initial washout with debridement, and amputation was considered. In February 2016, a second washout was performed from which deep tissue swabs showed non-nucleated acid-fast bacilli on a smear. A comprehensive medical history taken in February 2016 revealed that, in addition to the African gray parrot, the patient kept tropical fish and had cleaned the fish tank thoroughly following the parrot bite. The organism identified as the cause of this man’s infection is a naturally occurring aquatic organism found in freshwater and salt water. In humans, it predominantly causes soft tissue infections following exposure to contaminated water. The most common presentation is “fish tank granuloma”, i.e., hand infection following exposure to fish tank water. The majority of cases have a preceding injury to the hand (e.g., bites, abrasions, or puncture wounds) prior to the exposure that allowed entry of the organism through the dermis and into the soft tissue. Based on what you know about the cell structure of the etiological agent, is it likely that the fish tank water can be easily treated with disinfectants to kill the agent but not the fish?
Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) is a virus that can cause mild to s…
Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) is a virus that can cause mild to severe respiratory symptoms, especially in children. Since 1987, small numbers of EV-D68 cases in the US have been reported regularly to CDC. The number of people with new, confirmed EV-D68 infection was much greater in 2014 than that reported in previous years. The term that best describes the status of EV-D68 in 2014 is
Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) is a virus that can cause mild to s…
Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) is a virus that can cause mild to severe respiratory symptoms, especially in children. Since 1987, small numbers of EV-D68 cases in the US have been reported regularly to CDC. The number of people with new, confirmed EV-D68 infection was much greater in 2014 than that reported in previous years. The term that best describes the status of EV-D68 in 2014 is
Choose all that apply: Normal microbiota is found in humans…
Choose all that apply: Normal microbiota is found in humans in/on the
Match the type of infection to its proper description.
Match the type of infection to its proper description.
Match the type of infection to its proper description.
Match the type of infection to its proper description.
True/False: Few new HIV infections are currently being diagn…
True/False: Few new HIV infections are currently being diagnosed in the US, and HIV is not thought of as a problem anymore in the US by the CDC.
True/False: Few new HIV infections are currently being diagn…
True/False: Few new HIV infections are currently being diagnosed in the US, and HIV is not thought of as a problem anymore in the US by the CDC.