Isla owned several thriving shopping malls, and she was nego…

Isla owned several thriving shopping malls, and she was negotiating to purchase South Coast Plaza from the company that currently owned it. Sarah, a staff attorney for the state transportation department who shopped at South Coast Plaza regularly, learned of the negotiations and contacted Isla. South Coast Plaza had deteriorated noticeably during the time the current company had owned it and Sarah believed that new ownership would revitalize South Coast Plaza considerably. Although Sarah had no information to support this, she told Isla that the state was currently planning to construct a new interchange for the freeway only three blocks from South Coast Plaza. Isla went ahead with the purchase, believing that the new interchange would boost sales. In fact, no interchange was being considered by the state at that time, and nothing that Isla did after she purchased South Coast Plaza could stem the decline in sales. Isla ended up selling South Coast Plaza at a substantial loss several years after the purchase.Does Isla have a cause of action against Sarah for her losses?