In his discussion about reductionism, and the importance of…

In his discussion about reductionism, and the importance of having an objective characterization, Nagel uses an example of how one could understand the physical phenomena, but not understand human concepts and how they occupy our phenomenal world.  Which of the following is the example Nagel uses to illustrate this point? 

In the following, select that argument that best corresponds…

In the following, select that argument that best corresponds with the following descriptions:  It is not possible for us to be the ultimate originator of our actions [which1] If determinism is true, then Beth cannot but do A, and then Beth does not do A freely, and then Beth is not morally responsible for A-ing. [which2] Causal antecedents make it so that doing A is irresistible [which4]