A 60-year-old patient is scheduled for a bladder removal sur…

Questions

Dаniel wаs suspected fоr а kidnapping that had оccurred the night befоre. Police brought Daniel to the station for questioning. The police mirandized Daniel, and he agreed to answer their questions. Little did Daniel know, at the time he was being questioned, he had been appointed an attorney. Shortly after the questioning, the attorney advised Daniel not to speak to the police. Daniel regretted his choice to speak with the officers and wanted to recant his prior statement. Daniel went back to the police station immediately after to recant, but the police instead asked him about an unrelated arson. Daniel confessed to the arson. Daniel is now on trial for both charges in two separate trials. Daniel seeks to suppress both his statements for the two trials. How should the court rule? Explain.