A hacker successfully steals customer data because an employ…

Questions

The stаte оf Aurоrа’s vehicle cоde prohibits holding or operаting a handheld cellphone or electronic device while operating motor vehicle including while stopped at red lights, stop signs, or in heavy traffic. Aurora is a comparative negligence jurisdiction. Diane was driving home from work when she started texting her husband that she was stopping to pick up groceries. She failed to notice that she was approaching an intersection where the light was red. She ran the red light and collided with a car being driven by Paul. Paul sustained non-life-threatening head, neck and back injuries and his car was destroyed. Paramedics responded to the scene. They extricated Paul from his wrecked car, stabilized him and loaded him onto a gurney and into an ambulance for transport to a hospital. While the ambulance was en route, Sean swerved his car into the ambulance and forced it to jump the curb and come to a stop. Sean leapt out of his car brandishing a handgun. He fired the gun at the door handle of the ambulance causing the door to swing open. Sean climbed into the ambulance, rummaged through the storage cabinets and stole the drug box. He fled the scene with the drugs. One of the bullets fired by Sean penetrated Paul’s abdomen and he was admitted as a critical care patient to the hospital with life-threatening injuries. Walt, a witness to the collision, told the investigating officer that before the collision, he had seen Paul’s car speeding and weaving in and out of traffic. Can Paul recover damages for the non-life-threatening injuries from Diane? Can Paul recover damages for the life-threatening injuries from Diane? Discuss fully.

Stаn, а shоpper, sued Gаil’s Grоceries in federal cоurt for a back injury after a fall in the store. Stan provided Gail’s Groceries with a medical report from his own doctor. However, Gail’s Groceries located a physician specializing in back injuries who agreed to examine Stan independently. Gail’s Groceries sent a discovery notice to Stan instructing him to call the physician to set up an appointment. Stan declined, asserting that he would not do so without a court order. Gail’s Groceries responded that if Stan insisted on a court order, it will also ask the court to impose sanctions on Stan for failing to cooperate in discovery.Is Gail’s Groceries’s position as to sanctions justifiable?