Dаy 2 InstructiоnsWelcоme tо Dаy 2 of the Midterm Exаm. Below you will find the full text of what you wrote on Day 1. You may copy and paste from it freely as you continue working.Your Day 2 submission is what will be graded. Use this session to:Continue writing where you left off.Revise, restructure, or strengthen your argument.Add engagement with sources you did not address on Day 1.Develop your response to objections more fully.Reminder: Your essay should be 800–1,500 words. All original exam instructions and constraints still apply.A note on your Day 1 work: Before continuing, revisit your use of Parfit's fission case (the "righty and lefty" example). Parfit's point in that case is that when one person branches into two, we cannot say that the original is identical to both because the two continuers are clearly not identical to each other. This is why Parfit concludes that identity is not what matters in survival. Consider how this bears on the overlapping clones scenario: if both clones stand in Relation R to Sam Bell Prime but not to each other, what does that imply about the corporation's claim that "nothing has changed"? Make sure your Day 2 essay addresses this tension directly.Day 2 Wrinkle: As you continue your essay, consider the following claim from Parfit: the reductionist view does not entail that we should be less concerned about our future welfare rather it entails that we should be more concerned about the welfare of others. How does this claim bear on the argument you are making?Your Day 1 Writing:as we all know, Sam Bell and his clones are the same person and they carry the same identity, therefor the simultaneous activation of two clones or more won't change the moral status of the arrangement. here are some reasons to why we can conclude that it won't change the moral status of the arrangement. Firstly, they are both serving the same purpose which the original Sam Bell served and also agreed to, if we take the righty and lefty example of Parfits we are going to see that one can become two, A = B, A = C, then B = C, therefore the overlapping won't change the moral agreement. secondly, from a hedonistic perspective if the greater good is to split one person into two to satisfy the demand of helium-3 then we should do that as a necessary splitting or cloning for the greater good.from the Buddhist perspective, there is no soul, if the phycological continuity is what actually matters as Parfit says then overlapping the clones for the benefit of the people and the future Sam bell is what matters the most, if cloning one Sam Bell to benefit the future Sam bell and the company is morally accepted which means there are already two Sam Bells one is on the moon and one is on earth then what is wrong with overlapping a third Sam bell? why will it change the moral status? it is ridiculous how people are going to think that two Sam bells is ok but three is not acceptable even though the two clones are actually doing the work to satisfy the demand of helium-3.Think about it this way, if both clones are working for the future Sam Bell and the Future Sam bell is getting paid then it should be morally accepted, the problem I see that might happen is that both clones meet thinking they are the original Sam Bell, but how is that risk any different from the risk of the first clone finding out he is a clone, that risk is there even if we didn't overlap a second clone along with the first one. another problem I see that we had to lie or trick both clones thinking that they are the original Sam Bell, but is that any different from lying to the first clone and making him think that he is the original Sam Bell not a clone? I don't see any difference at all. now let's talk about what benefits we can get from overlapping two clone simultaneously. Firstly, we get to produce more heluim-3 to satisfy the demand on earth and we are not talking about a bit more we are talking about doubling the production of helium-3 to satisfy the demand. secondly, we won't have to send more people to moon and taking a big risk of keeping them in space and if something happens to them it will cost the company a load of money. thirdly, we will save more time by cloning two Sam Bells simultaneously instead of sending more people to the moon and training them. fourthly, assuring that the job is going to be done since the original (prime) Sam Bell already served his three years with no issues and he knew what he was doing, therefore the clones are going to do the work just like the prime Sam Bell did. Lastly, Prime Sam Bell will get paid more since two of him are working simultaneously on the moon.