Pleаse аnswer BOTH PARTS оf the fоllоwing question. Mаke sure that you thoroughly explain your reasoning for each answer.After an ordeal involving a sprained tail and a five-hour wait at Pet Emergency, Fauci decides that dogs need more televet options for dealing with minor illnesses and injuries. He establishes a corporation called DogDocs, which is incorporated in Delaware and has its headquarters in Seattle, Washington. DogDocs operates a secure website on which dogs needing minor medical treatment can receive televet consultations with vets who are licensed to practice in their state. Rather than directly employing the vets, DogDocs enters into fee-for-service contracts with them which obligate them to see a certain number of DogDocs patients each month for a fixed fee. All DogDocs treatment is provided online; no in-person services are provided to patients by the vets they see through DogDocs, and DogDocs does not have a physical presence in any state other than Washington.Ellie (a resident of Alaska) develops a bad cough. She has been banned from receiving treatment from any local vet clincs due to her history of filing spurious malpractice lawsuits, so she decides to look for a telemedicine option. While on BarkBook, she sees an ad for DogDocs. The ad says "DogDocs services now available in Alaska! Alaska dogs log on today and receive 15% off your first DogDocs consultation!" When she logs onto the DogDocs site, she sees a banner ad that says "DogDocs has specialty vets for all those pesky conditions that plague Alaska dogs -- say goodbye to frostbite, beaver bites and more with DogDocs!" There is also a link with a customer service email address and phone number for dogs to call if they have problems with the DogDocs service. Ellie registers with DogDocs and is paired with a vet, Dr. Growls, who lives in Seward and is licensed to practice in Alaska. Dr. Growls is the only Alaska vet contracted to provide DogDocs services and sees three or four DogDocs clients per month. Dr. Growls tells Ellie that she probably just has a cold and advises her to drink plenty of water, preferably not out of the toilet, and rest. Ellie follows this advice for a week, but continues to get worse. Finally, she goes to Pet Emergency, which is not allowed to turn her away, and is told she has kennel cough and has developed pneumonia. She is sent home with a prescription for antibiotics and a stern warning that suing Pet Emergency would make her a very bad girl. A) Ellie sues DogDocs for $100,000 for professional negligence, a state law claim, in Alaska state court. DogDocs files a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Alaska state court system lacks personal jurisdiction over it.* How should the judge rule on this motion? Make sure you address all the components of personal jurisdiction in your answer, and provide a *detailed* explanation of the law and your application of it to the facts of the scenario. B) Ellie ultimately decides to file her lawsuit against DogDocs in federal court. After filing her initial suit, Ellie decides she wants to add Dr. Growls as an additional defendant under Rule 20, asserting a $50,000 claim against him. Can the federal court exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over Ellie's claim against Dr. Growls? Make sure you clearly identify the potential grounds for subject matter jurisdiction, and a detailed explanation of the law and your application of it to the facts of the scenario. *There is a portion of Alaska's longarm statute that provides jurisdiction over a party who "is engaged in substantial and not isolated activities in this state, whether the activities are wholly interstate, intrastate, or otherwise." Alaska Stat. § 09.05.015.
Ellie sues Fаuci fоr bаttery in Alаska state cоurt after he tips a table intо her during a fight at the Wrecked Whippet. Fauci files a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, which is denied. How long does he then have to file his answer?