Whether а suspect will be cоnsidered tо be "in custоdy" will depend upon:
Define plurаlism, аssimilаtiоn, segregatiоn, and genоcide. Provide at least one example of each in the history of the United States. Rubric Criteria Score 2 (Excellent)** Score 1 (Proficient)** Score 0 (Needs Improvement)** Accuracy of Definitions Provides clear, accurate definitions for each term, capturing key concepts and distinctions. Defines each term correctly but may lack detail or slight nuances in one or two definitions. Incorrect or unclear definitions, missing significant aspects of the terms. Historical Examples Includes specific, relevant historical U.S. examples for each term that accurately illustrate the concept. Provides examples for each term, but some may lack specificity or full relevance to the term being defined. Missing examples for some terms, or examples are irrelevant or inaccurate. Clarity of Explanation Explanations are clear, concise, and logically presented, making the response easy to understand. Generally clear explanation, though may have minor issues in wording or organization. Unclear or poorly organized explanations, making it difficult to follow the response. Connection Between Term and Example Each example clearly illustrates the corresponding term, with a strong link between the concept and historical event. Examples generally illustrate each term, but connections may lack depth or clarity in some cases. Examples provided do not clearly connect to the terms, or connections are inaccurate or poorly explained. Depth of Insight Shows a strong understanding of how each term and example reflects broader societal trends or impacts. Shows some understanding of societal trends or impacts but lacks depth in some explanations. Lacks insight into broader societal impacts, with minimal depth or understanding in explanations. Overall Completeness Covers all terms and examples thoroughly, demonstrating comprehensive understanding. Covers most terms and examples adequately, though some details or connections may be underdeveloped. Incomplete or superficial response, missing key terms or failing to provide sufficient examples or details.
Describe hоw gender hаs shаped yоur оwn life. Consider your relаtionships within the family, peer group, activities at school, athletics, and other dimensions of life. Rubric Criteria Score 2 (Excellent) Score 1 (Proficient) Score 0 (Needs Improvement) Depth of Reflection Provides a thorough and introspective reflection on how gender has impacted multiple areas of life (e.g., family, peers, school, athletics). Offers a general reflection on gender’s impact, with some areas addressed but lacking depth in a few aspects. Limited or superficial reflection on gender’s impact, with little to no connection to personal experiences. Use of Specific Examples Includes specific and relevant examples from various life areas, clearly illustrating the influence of gender. Provides one or two relevant examples but may lack variety or specificity across different areas. Examples are missing, irrelevant, or too vague to illustrate gender’s influence effectively. Insight and Analysis Insightfully analyzes how gender roles, expectations, or stereotypes have shaped experiences, showing a strong understanding of personal impact. Offers some analysis of gender roles or stereotypes but lacks depth or connection to personal experiences. Limited or no analysis; response lacks connections between gender and personal experiences. Clarity and Organization Response is well-organized, flows logically, and clearly communicates ideas, making it easy to follow. Generally organized with some clarity issues; the argument is understandable with minor issues in flow. Disorganized or unclear, making it difficult to follow ideas or connect examples to the overall reflection. Connection to Broader Understanding of Gender Demonstrates a strong understanding of how personal experiences relate to broader social or cultural gender expectations. Shows some connection to societal gender expectations, though may lack depth or clarity in connection. Lacks connection to broader gender expectations or fails to relate personal experiences to societal context.